IYC vs. IYM
IYC (iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF) and IYM (iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYC is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index, while IYM is a Materials fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYC returned 11.83%/yr vs 11.23%/yr for IYM. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IYC charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IYM.
Performance
IYC vs. IYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYC achieves a -1.40% return, which is significantly lower than IYM's 22.39% return. Over the past 10 years, IYC has outperformed IYM with an annualized return of 11.83%, while IYM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.23% annualized return.
IYC
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- -1.40%
- 6M
- -2.54%
- 1Y
- 6.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.17%
- 5Y*
- 6.41%
- 10Y*
- 11.83%
IYM
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- YTD
- 22.39%
- 6M
- 23.93%
- 1Y
- 37.90%
- 3Y*
- 14.64%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 11.23%
IYC vs. IYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | -1.40% | 7.85% | 27.54% | 34.03% | -31.78% | 19.65% | 24.58% | 27.36% | 1.76% | 19.87% |
IYM iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF | 22.39% | 20.41% | -4.54% | 12.83% | -9.15% | 25.62% | 17.87% | 19.22% | -16.63% | 24.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYC and IYM is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2000 | 0.66 |
The correlation between IYC and IYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IYC vs. IYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYC
IYM
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
-
Industrials
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
IYC
IYM
Communication Services
IYC
IYM
-
Consumer Defensive
IYC
IYM
-
Technology
IYC
IYM
-
Industrials
IYC
IYM
Energy
IYC
IYM
-
Basic Materials
IYC
-
IYM
Financial Services
IYC
-
IYM
-
Healthcare
IYC
-
IYM
-
Real Estate
IYC
-
IYM
-
Utilities
IYC
-
IYM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYC vs. IYM — Risk / Return Rank
IYC
IYM
IYC vs. IYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IYC | IYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.32 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 2.74 | -2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.28 | 10.29 | -9.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IYC vs. IYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYC drawdown since its inception was -53.10%, smaller than the maximum IYM drawdown of -67.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYC and IYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYC | IYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.10% | -67.78% | +14.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.97% | -13.61% | +1.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.62% | -23.62% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.90% | -29.94% | -5.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.90% | -42.76% | +6.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.12% | -0.61% | -4.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.95% | -11.45% | +1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | 3.61% | +0.47% |
Volatility
IYC vs. IYM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) is 4.33%, while iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM) has a volatility of 8.10%. This indicates that IYC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYC | IYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 8.10% | -3.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.74% | 15.79% | -5.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.44% | 19.55% | -5.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.74% | 20.53% | +0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 21.77% | -1.87% |
IYC vs. IYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than IYM's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYC vs. IYM - Dividend Comparison
IYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than IYM's 1.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.47% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.39% | 0.65% | 0.89% | 0.90% | 0.92% | 1.10% | 1.03% |
IYM iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF | 1.23% | 1.51% | 1.65% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 1.48% | 1.39% | 2.08% | 1.68% | 1.43% | 1.47% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYC and IYM have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IYM has higher volatility (8.10%) compared to IYC (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYC dropped -53.10% vs IYM's -67.78%.
On 10-year performance, IYC leads with 11.83% vs 11.23% for IYM. On fees, IYC is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IYC has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYC has performed better with a 11.83% return vs 11.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYC is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYM.
IYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.50% for IYC.
IYC is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while IYM is Materials. IYC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index, while IYM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYC and 0.42% for IYM.
IYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYC and IYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer