PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYC vs. IYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYC vs. IYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYC achieves a -1.40% return, which is significantly lower than IYM's 22.39% return. Over the past 10 years, IYC has outperformed IYM with an annualized return of 11.83%, while IYM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.23% annualized return.


IYC

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
-1.40%
6M
-2.54%
1Y
6.51%
3Y*
14.17%
5Y*
6.41%
10Y*
11.83%

IYM

1D
1.70%
1M
1.07%
YTD
22.39%
6M
23.93%
1Y
37.90%
3Y*
14.64%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
11.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYC vs. IYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
-1.40%7.85%27.54%34.03%-31.78%19.65%24.58%27.36%1.76%19.87%
IYM
iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF
22.39%20.41%-4.54%12.83%-9.15%25.62%17.87%19.22%-16.63%24.83%

Correlation

The correlation between IYC and IYM is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2000

0.66

The correlation between IYC and IYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IYC vs. IYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYC
IYM

Consumer Cyclical

67.4%
3.3%

Communication Services

13.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

11.4%

-

Technology

3.7%

-

Industrials

3.5%
11.9%

Energy

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

84.5%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

IYC
67.4%
IYM
3.3%

Communication Services

IYC
13.6%
IYM

-

Consumer Defensive

IYC
11.4%
IYM

-

Technology

IYC
3.7%
IYM

-

Industrials

IYC
3.5%
IYM
11.9%

Energy

IYC
0.1%
IYM

-

Basic Materials

IYC

-

IYM
84.5%

Financial Services

IYC

-

IYM

-

Healthcare

IYC

-

IYM

-

Real Estate

IYC

-

IYM

-

Utilities

IYC

-

IYM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYC vs. IYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYC
IYC Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
IYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYC Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
IYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYC Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

IYM
IYM Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYM Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
IYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYC vs. IYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IYCIYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.32

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

2.74

-2.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.28

10.29

-9.01

IYC vs. IYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYC Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the IYM Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYC and IYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYC vs. IYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYC drawdown since its inception was -53.10%, smaller than the maximum IYM drawdown of -67.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYC and IYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYCIYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.10%

-67.78%

+14.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.97%

-13.61%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.62%

-23.62%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.90%

-29.94%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.90%

-42.76%

+6.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.12%

-0.61%

-4.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.95%

-11.45%

+1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.08%

3.61%

+0.47%

Volatility

IYC vs. IYM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) is 4.33%, while iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM) has a volatility of 8.10%. This indicates that IYC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYCIYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

8.10%

-3.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.74%

15.79%

-5.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.44%

19.55%

-5.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.74%

20.53%

+0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.90%

21.77%

-1.87%

IYC vs. IYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than IYM's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYC vs. IYM - Dividend Comparison

IYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than IYM's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.50%0.51%0.47%0.68%0.68%0.39%0.65%0.89%0.90%0.92%1.10%1.03%
IYM
iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF
1.23%1.51%1.65%1.77%2.14%1.48%1.39%2.08%1.68%1.43%1.47%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYC and IYM have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYM has higher volatility (8.10%) compared to IYC (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYC dropped -53.10% vs IYM's -67.78%.

On 10-year performance, IYC leads with 11.83% vs 11.23% for IYM. On fees, IYC is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IYC has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYC has performed better with a 11.83% return vs 11.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYC is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYM.

IYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.50% for IYC.

IYC is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while IYM is Materials. IYC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index, while IYM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYC and 0.42% for IYM.

IYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYC and IYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer