IYM vs. SOXX
IYM (iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYM is a Materials fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index, while SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYM returned 11.01%/yr vs 36.08%/yr for SOXX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IYM charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for SOXX.
Performance
IYM vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYM achieves a 17.90% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 100.58% return. Over the past 10 years, IYM has underperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 11.01%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively higher 36.08% annualized return.
IYM
- 1D
- -2.46%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 17.90%
- 6M
- 15.84%
- 1Y
- 33.18%
- 3Y*
- 13.92%
- 5Y*
- 8.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.01%
SOXX
- 1D
- -7.88%
- 1M
- 12.35%
- YTD
- 100.58%
- 6M
- 98.07%
- 1Y
- 167.63%
- 3Y*
- 56.18%
- 5Y*
- 33.69%
- 10Y*
- 36.08%
IYM vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYM iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF | 17.90% | 20.41% | -4.54% | 12.83% | -9.15% | 25.62% | 17.87% | 19.22% | -16.63% | 24.83% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 100.58% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | -35.09% | 44.09% | 52.72% | 62.42% | -6.49% | 39.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYM and SOXX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2001 | 0.60 |
The correlation between IYM and SOXX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IYM vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYM
SOXX
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
IYM
SOXX
-
Industrials
IYM
SOXX
-
Consumer Cyclical
IYM
SOXX
-
Communication Services
IYM
-
SOXX
-
Consumer Defensive
IYM
-
SOXX
-
Energy
IYM
-
SOXX
-
Financial Services
IYM
-
SOXX
-
Healthcare
IYM
-
SOXX
-
Real Estate
IYM
-
SOXX
-
Technology
IYM
-
SOXX
Utilities
IYM
-
SOXX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYM vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank
IYM
SOXX
IYM vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IYM | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.60 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 10.70 | -8.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.18 | 38.46 | -29.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IYM vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYM drawdown since its inception was -67.78%, roughly equal to the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYM and SOXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYM | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.78% | -70.21% | +2.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.61% | -15.77% | +2.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.62% | -41.36% | +17.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.94% | -45.75% | +15.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.76% | -45.75% | +2.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.48% | -7.88% | +3.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.44% | -19.94% | +8.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.63% | 4.38% | -0.75% |
Volatility
IYM vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM) is 7.49%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 22.75%. This indicates that IYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYM | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.49% | 22.75% | -15.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.94% | 33.44% | -17.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.72% | 39.42% | -19.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.51% | 37.21% | -16.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.74% | 34.00% | -12.26% |
IYM vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYM has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYM vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison
IYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than SOXX's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYM iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF | 1.29% | 1.51% | 1.65% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 1.48% | 1.39% | 2.08% | 1.68% | 1.43% | 1.47% | 2.04% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.24% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYM and SOXX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXX has higher volatility (22.75%) compared to IYM (7.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYM dropped -67.78% vs SOXX's -70.21%.
On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 36.08% vs 11.01% for IYM. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, IYM has been the lower-risk option at 7.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 36.08% return vs 11.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYM.
IYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.24% for SOXX.
IYM is categorized as Materials, while SOXX is Semiconductors. IYM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYM and 0.34% for SOXX.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.28 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYM and SOXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer