IYM vs. VTI
IYM (iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYM is a Materials fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYM returned 11.01%/yr vs 15.14%/yr for VTI. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IYM charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
IYM vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYM achieves a 17.90% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 8.82% return. Over the past 10 years, IYM has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 11.01%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.
IYM
- 1D
- -2.46%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 17.90%
- 6M
- 15.84%
- 1Y
- 33.18%
- 3Y*
- 13.92%
- 5Y*
- 8.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.01%
VTI
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- 8.82%
- 6M
- 7.71%
- 1Y
- 24.22%
- 3Y*
- 20.62%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
IYM vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYM iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF | 17.90% | 20.41% | -4.54% | 12.83% | -9.15% | 25.62% | 17.87% | 19.22% | -16.63% | 24.83% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 8.82% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYM and VTI is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2001 | 0.77 |
The correlation between IYM and VTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IYM vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYM
VTI
Basic Materials
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
IYM
VTI
Industrials
IYM
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
IYM
VTI
Communication Services
IYM
-
VTI
Consumer Defensive
IYM
-
VTI
Energy
IYM
-
VTI
Financial Services
IYM
-
VTI
Healthcare
IYM
-
VTI
Real Estate
IYM
-
VTI
Technology
IYM
-
VTI
Utilities
IYM
-
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYM vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
IYM
VTI
IYM vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IYM | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.34 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 2.73 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.18 | 12.14 | -2.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IYM vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYM drawdown since its inception was -67.78%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYM and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYM | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.78% | -55.45% | -12.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.61% | -8.92% | -4.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.62% | -19.30% | -4.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.94% | -25.36% | -4.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.76% | -35.00% | -7.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.48% | -2.85% | -1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.44% | -8.01% | -3.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.63% | 2.00% | +1.63% |
Volatility
IYM vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM) has a higher volatility of 7.49% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 4.95%. This indicates that IYM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYM | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.49% | 4.95% | +2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.94% | 10.05% | +5.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.72% | 12.83% | +6.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.51% | 17.51% | +3.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.74% | 18.32% | +3.42% |
IYM vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYM has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYM vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
IYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than VTI's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYM iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF | 1.29% | 1.51% | 1.65% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 1.48% | 1.39% | 2.08% | 1.68% | 1.43% | 1.47% | 2.04% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.04% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYM and VTI have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IYM has higher volatility (7.49%) compared to VTI (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYM dropped -67.78% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.14% vs 11.01% for IYM. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 4.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.14% return vs 11.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYM.
IYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 1.04% for VTI.
IYM is categorized as Materials, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. IYM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYM and 0.03% for VTI.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYM and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer