IYC vs. IYF
IYC (iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF) and IYF (iShares U.S. Financials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYC is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index, while IYF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYC returned 11.83%/yr vs 13.53%/yr for IYF. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IYC charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IYF.
Performance
IYC vs. IYF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYC achieves a -1.40% return, which is significantly lower than IYF's -0.19% return. Over the past 10 years, IYC has underperformed IYF with an annualized return of 11.83%, while IYF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.53% annualized return.
IYC
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- -1.40%
- 6M
- -2.54%
- 1Y
- 6.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.17%
- 5Y*
- 6.41%
- 10Y*
- 11.83%
IYF
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- -0.19%
- 6M
- -0.21%
- 1Y
- 13.73%
- 3Y*
- 21.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.87%
- 10Y*
- 13.53%
IYC vs. IYF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | -1.40% | 7.85% | 27.54% | 34.03% | -31.78% | 19.65% | 24.58% | 27.36% | 1.76% | 19.87% |
IYF iShares U.S. Financials ETF | -0.19% | 18.25% | 31.30% | 15.32% | -11.33% | 31.60% | -1.00% | 31.86% | -9.39% | 19.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYC and IYF is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2000 | 0.74 |
The correlation between IYC and IYF shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (3 years) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IYC vs. IYF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYC
IYF
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
IYC
IYF
-
Communication Services
IYC
IYF
-
Consumer Defensive
IYC
IYF
-
Technology
IYC
IYF
Industrials
IYC
IYF
-
Energy
IYC
IYF
-
Basic Materials
IYC
-
IYF
-
Financial Services
IYC
-
IYF
Healthcare
IYC
-
IYF
-
Real Estate
IYC
-
IYF
Utilities
IYC
-
IYF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYC vs. IYF — Risk / Return Rank
IYC
IYF
IYC vs. IYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IYC | IYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.15 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 0.88 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.28 | 2.38 | -1.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IYC vs. IYF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYC drawdown since its inception was -53.10%, smaller than the maximum IYF drawdown of -79.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYC and IYF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYC | IYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.10% | -79.09% | +25.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.97% | -13.88% | +1.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.62% | -16.60% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.90% | -25.06% | -10.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.90% | -42.57% | +6.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.12% | -3.25% | -1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.95% | -17.59% | +7.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | 5.13% | -1.05% |
Volatility
IYC vs. IYF - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) have volatilities of 4.33% and 4.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYC | IYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 4.27% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.74% | 11.12% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.44% | 14.58% | -0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.74% | 19.04% | +1.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 20.90% | -1.00% |
IYC vs. IYF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than IYF's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYC vs. IYF - Dividend Comparison
IYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than IYF's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.47% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.39% | 0.65% | 0.89% | 0.90% | 0.92% | 1.10% | 1.03% |
IYF iShares U.S. Financials ETF | 1.49% | 1.32% | 1.29% | 1.67% | 1.86% | 1.27% | 1.72% | 1.64% | 1.90% | 1.46% | 1.67% | 1.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYC and IYF have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IYC has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to IYF (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYC dropped -53.10% vs IYF's -79.09%.
On 10-year performance, IYF leads with 13.53% vs 11.83% for IYC. On fees, IYC is cheaper at 0.38% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYF has performed better with a 13.53% return vs 11.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYC is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYF.
IYF has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.50% for IYC.
IYC is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while IYF is Financials Equities. IYC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index, while IYF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYC and 0.42% for IYF.
IYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYC and IYF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer