PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYC vs. FXD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYC vs. FXD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYC achieves a -2.72% return, which is significantly lower than FXD's -1.88% return. Over the past 10 years, IYC has outperformed FXD with an annualized return of 11.49%, while FXD has yielded a comparatively lower 7.89% annualized return.


IYC

1D
-0.53%
1M
-1.30%
YTD
-2.72%
6M
-2.86%
1Y
3.35%
3Y*
15.36%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
11.49%

FXD

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.79%
YTD
-1.88%
6M
-1.26%
1Y
9.00%
3Y*
10.33%
5Y*
3.00%
10Y*
7.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYC vs. FXD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
-2.72%7.85%27.54%34.03%-31.78%19.65%24.58%27.36%1.76%19.87%
FXD
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund
-1.88%6.70%10.57%23.39%-21.56%22.72%12.97%24.22%-11.60%19.77%

Correlation

The correlation between IYC and FXD is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007

0.86

The correlation between IYC and FXD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

IYC vs. FXD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYC
FXD

Consumer Cyclical

67.8%
69.7%

Communication Services

13.7%
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

11.2%
9.2%

Technology

3.6%
2.5%

Industrials

3.5%
9.2%

Energy

0.1%
0.8%

Basic Materials

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

IYC
67.8%
FXD
69.7%

Communication Services

IYC
13.7%
FXD
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

IYC
11.2%
FXD
9.2%

Technology

IYC
3.6%
FXD
2.5%

Industrials

IYC
3.5%
FXD
9.2%

Energy

IYC
0.1%
FXD
0.8%

Basic Materials

IYC

-

FXD

-

Financial Services

IYC

-

FXD

-

Healthcare

IYC

-

FXD

-

Real Estate

IYC

-

FXD

-

Utilities

IYC

-

FXD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYC vs. FXD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYC
IYC Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
IYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYC Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
IYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYC Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

FXD
FXD Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FXD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXD Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FXD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXD Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYC vs. FXD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IYCFXDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.09

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

0.65

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.85

1.65

-0.80

IYC vs. FXD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYC Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the FXD Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYC and FXD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IYCFXDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

0.47

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.13

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.33

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.31

+0.11

Drawdowns

IYC vs. FXD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYC drawdown since its inception was -53.10%, smaller than the maximum FXD drawdown of -65.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYC and FXD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYCFXDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.10%

-65.27%

+12.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.97%

-13.94%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.62%

-26.02%

+4.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.90%

-33.74%

-2.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.90%

-49.54%

+13.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.39%

-7.12%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.95%

-10.97%

+1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.95%

5.48%

-1.53%

Volatility

IYC vs. FXD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) is 3.97%, while First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) has a volatility of 6.00%. This indicates that IYC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYCFXDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

6.00%

-2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.50%

14.23%

-3.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.32%

19.21%

-4.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.73%

22.70%

-1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.89%

23.67%

-3.78%

IYC vs. FXD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FXD's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYC vs. FXD - Dividend Comparison

IYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than FXD's 0.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXD
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund
0.78%0.80%0.89%0.70%1.00%0.62%0.42%0.92%1.08%0.93%1.05%0.90%
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.51%0.51%0.47%0.68%0.68%0.39%0.65%0.89%0.90%0.92%1.10%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYC and FXD have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXD has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to IYC (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYC dropped -53.10% vs FXD's -65.27%.

On 10-year performance, IYC leads with 11.49% vs 7.89% for FXD. On fees, IYC is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IYC has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYC has performed better with a 11.49% return vs 7.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYC is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FXD.

FXD has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.51% for IYC.

IYC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index, while FXD tracks StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYC and 0.63% for FXD.

FXD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYC and FXD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer