PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYC vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYC vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYC achieves a -3.42% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 9.19% return. Over the past 10 years, IYC has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 11.80%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.62% annualized return.


IYC

1D
-0.27%
1M
-2.64%
YTD
-3.42%
6M
-4.50%
1Y
2.57%
3Y*
13.50%
5Y*
5.77%
10Y*
11.80%

DGRO

1D
0.32%
1M
0.80%
YTD
9.19%
6M
8.52%
1Y
22.22%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
11.00%
10Y*
13.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYC vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
-3.42%7.85%27.54%34.03%-31.78%19.65%24.58%27.36%1.76%19.87%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
9.19%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IYC and DGRO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.79

The correlation between IYC and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IYC vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYC
DGRO

Consumer Cyclical

67.8%
5.4%

Communication Services

13.4%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

11.2%
11.1%

Technology

3.8%
22.0%

Industrials

3.6%
10.4%

Energy

0.1%
5.1%

Basic Materials

-

2.4%

Financial Services

-

20.6%

Healthcare

-

16.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IYC
67.8%
DGRO
5.4%

Communication Services

IYC
13.4%
DGRO
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

IYC
11.2%
DGRO
11.1%

Technology

IYC
3.8%
DGRO
22.0%

Industrials

IYC
3.6%
DGRO
10.4%

Energy

IYC
0.1%
DGRO
5.1%

Basic Materials

IYC

-

DGRO
2.4%

Financial Services

IYC

-

DGRO
20.6%

Healthcare

IYC

-

DGRO
16.5%

Real Estate

IYC

-

DGRO

-

Utilities

IYC

-

DGRO
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYC vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYC
IYC Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
IYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYC Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
IYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYC Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYC vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IYCDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.42

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.22

3.45

-3.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.62

13.31

-12.70

IYC vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYC Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYC and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYC vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYC drawdown since its inception was -53.10%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYC and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYCDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.10%

-35.10%

-18.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.97%

-6.47%

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.62%

-14.03%

-7.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.90%

-19.31%

-16.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.90%

-35.10%

-0.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.07%

-0.90%

-6.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.94%

-3.43%

-6.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.17%

1.67%

+2.50%

Volatility

IYC vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.63%. This indicates that IYC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYCDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

2.63%

+2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.18%

6.94%

+4.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.65%

9.53%

+5.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.80%

13.80%

+7.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.91%

16.60%

+3.31%

IYC vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYC vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

IYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than DGRO's 1.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.97%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.52%0.51%0.47%0.68%0.68%0.39%0.65%0.89%0.90%0.92%1.10%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYC and DGRO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYC has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to DGRO (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYC dropped -53.10% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.62% vs 11.80% for IYC. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.62% return vs 11.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IYC.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.52% for IYC.

IYC is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. IYC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYC and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYC and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer