PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXUS vs. RODM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXUS vs. RODM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXUS achieves a 12.67% return, which is significantly higher than RODM's 9.95% return. Over the past 10 years, IXUS has outperformed RODM with an annualized return of 10.20%, while RODM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.29% annualized return.


IXUS

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.39%
YTD
12.67%
6M
12.28%
1Y
27.43%
3Y*
18.99%
5Y*
8.18%
10Y*
10.20%

RODM

1D
-0.18%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
9.95%
6M
9.50%
1Y
22.82%
3Y*
20.09%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
9.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXUS vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
12.67%32.40%5.19%15.83%-16.47%8.86%10.80%21.71%-14.41%28.12%
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
9.95%34.42%8.02%15.76%-14.54%11.11%-0.62%17.15%-9.97%25.14%

Correlation

The correlation between IXUS and RODM is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015

0.86

The correlation between IXUS and RODM shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IXUS vs. RODM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IXUS
RODM

Technology

30.5%
10.5%

Financial Services

23.8%
26.6%

Industrials

11.3%
16.7%

Healthcare

6.5%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
6.0%

Basic Materials

5.0%
6.4%

Energy

4.4%
6.3%

Communication Services

4.2%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
4.0%

Utilities

1.9%
4.8%

Real Estate

0.2%
3.5%

Technology

IXUS
30.5%
RODM
10.5%

Financial Services

IXUS
23.8%
RODM
26.6%

Industrials

IXUS
11.3%
RODM
16.7%

Healthcare

IXUS
6.5%
RODM
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IXUS
5.6%
RODM
6.0%

Basic Materials

IXUS
5.0%
RODM
6.4%

Energy

IXUS
4.4%
RODM
6.3%

Communication Services

IXUS
4.2%
RODM
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

IXUS
3.9%
RODM
4.0%

Utilities

IXUS
1.9%
RODM
4.8%

Real Estate

IXUS
0.2%
RODM
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXUS vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXUS
IXUS Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
IXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

RODM
RODM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXUS vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IXUSRODMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.38

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

3.23

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.30

12.73

-3.42

IXUS vs. RODM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the RODM Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXUS and RODM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IXUS vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXUS drawdown since its inception was -36.22%, roughly equal to the maximum RODM drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXUS and RODM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXUSRODMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.22%

-35.98%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.36%

-7.10%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.75%

-10.58%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.03%

-28.85%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.22%

-35.98%

-0.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.14%

-2.34%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.48%

-6.35%

-1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

1.80%

+1.16%

Volatility

IXUS vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) has a higher volatility of 7.22% compared to Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) at 3.21%. This indicates that IXUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXUSRODMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.22%

3.21%

+4.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.63%

8.76%

+5.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.55%

10.94%

+5.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.44%

13.45%

+2.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

15.07%

+1.90%

IXUS vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXUS vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison

IXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, more than RODM's 2.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
2.98%3.24%3.33%3.13%2.48%3.12%1.85%3.09%3.00%2.41%2.58%2.81%
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
2.83%3.11%4.09%4.42%3.81%4.41%2.82%2.82%2.03%2.24%3.19%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


IXUS and RODM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXUS has higher volatility (7.22%) compared to RODM (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXUS dropped -36.22% vs RODM's -35.98%.

On 10-year performance, IXUS leads with 10.20% vs 9.29% for RODM. On fees, IXUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IXUS has performed better with a 10.20% return vs 9.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for RODM.

IXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 2.83% for RODM.

IXUS tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index (Net), while RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IXUS and 0.29% for RODM.

RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXUS and RODM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer