PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXP vs. QUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXP vs. QUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXP achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly lower than QUS's 6.67% return. Over the past 10 years, IXP has underperformed QUS with an annualized return of 9.33%, while QUS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.67% annualized return.


IXP

1D
-1.03%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
0.11%
6M
0.33%
1Y
18.24%
3Y*
23.77%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
9.33%

QUS

1D
-0.43%
1M
2.68%
YTD
6.67%
6M
6.93%
1Y
17.65%
3Y*
17.53%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
13.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXP vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXP
iShares Global Comm Services ETF
0.11%29.27%31.33%38.80%-33.40%12.77%22.16%25.23%-13.67%6.65%
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
6.67%14.13%18.99%21.78%-14.15%26.72%12.40%32.45%-3.66%21.67%

Correlation

The correlation between IXP and QUS is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2015

0.69

The correlation between IXP and QUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

IXP vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IXP
QUS

Communication Services

97.7%
10.2%

Technology

2.0%
26.3%

Real Estate

0.5%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%
5.8%

Basic Materials

-

2.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

9.2%

Energy

-

4.6%

Financial Services

-

14.6%

Healthcare

-

13.4%

Industrials

-

8.6%

Utilities

-

3.6%

Communication Services

IXP
97.7%
QUS
10.2%

Technology

IXP
2.0%
QUS
26.3%

Real Estate

IXP
0.5%
QUS
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IXP
0.2%
QUS
5.8%

Basic Materials

IXP

-

QUS
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

IXP

-

QUS
9.2%

Energy

IXP

-

QUS
4.6%

Financial Services

IXP

-

QUS
14.6%

Healthcare

IXP

-

QUS
13.4%

Industrials

IXP

-

QUS
8.6%

Utilities

IXP

-

QUS
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXP vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXP
IXP Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
IXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXP Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXP Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

QUS
QUS Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
QUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXP vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IXPQUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.35

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

2.59

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.21

11.54

-6.33

IXP vs. QUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXP Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the QUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXP and QUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IXPQUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.95

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.78

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.83

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.77

-0.43

Drawdowns

IXP vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXP drawdown since its inception was -50.11%, which is greater than QUS's maximum drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXP and QUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXPQUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.11%

-33.78%

-16.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.26%

-6.85%

-5.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.54%

-13.94%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.30%

-22.30%

-22.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.30%

-33.78%

-10.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.08%

-0.50%

-3.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.92%

-3.70%

-8.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

1.53%

+1.98%

Volatility

IXP vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 1.78%. This indicates that IXP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXPQUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

1.78%

+2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.60%

6.66%

+3.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.62%

9.09%

+5.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.00%

14.33%

+4.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.52%

16.42%

+2.10%

IXP vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXP has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXP vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison

IXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, more than QUS's 1.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXP
iShares Global Comm Services ETF
2.98%2.98%1.35%1.24%0.62%1.80%0.95%2.18%4.32%3.41%4.02%3.89%
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
1.31%1.38%1.49%1.57%1.68%1.27%1.73%1.81%2.12%1.86%2.07%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


IXP and QUS have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXP has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to QUS (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXP dropped -50.11% vs QUS's -33.78%.

On 10-year performance, QUS leads with 13.67% vs 9.33% for IXP. On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QUS has performed better with a 13.67% return vs 9.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IXP.

IXP has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 1.31% for QUS.

IXP tracks S&P Global 1200 Communication Services 4.5/22.5/45 Capped, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IXP and 0.15% for QUS.

QUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXP and QUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer