IXP vs. IQM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM).
IXP and IQM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IXP is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global 1200 Communication Services 4.5/22.5/45 Capped. It was launched on Nov 12, 2001. IQM is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Feb 25, 2020.
Performance
IXP vs. IQM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IXP vs. IQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXP iShares Global Comm Services ETF | -4.77% | 29.27% | 31.33% | 38.80% | -33.40% | 12.77% | 28.65% |
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | 3.20% | 30.76% | 31.03% | 41.06% | -33.36% | 25.18% | 78.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IXP achieves a -4.77% return, which is significantly lower than IQM's 3.20% return.
IXP
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -4.84%
- YTD
- -4.77%
- 6M
- -3.63%
- 1Y
- 21.80%
- 3Y*
- 24.02%
- 5Y*
- 8.83%
- 10Y*
- 8.85%
IQM
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -3.98%
- YTD
- 3.20%
- 6M
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- 57.05%
- 3Y*
- 26.96%
- 5Y*
- 15.40%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IXP vs. IQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXP has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than IQM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IXP vs. IQM — Risk / Return Rank
IXP
IQM
IXP vs. IQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IXP | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 1.72 | -0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | 2.33 | -0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.33 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 4.00 | -2.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.69 | 12.47 | -5.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IXP | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 1.72 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.54 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.78 | -0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between IXP and IQM is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IXP vs. IQM - Dividend Comparison
IXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, while IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXP iShares Global Comm Services ETF | 3.13% | 2.98% | 1.35% | 1.24% | 0.62% | 1.80% | 0.95% | 2.18% | 4.32% | 3.41% | 4.02% | 3.89% |
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IXP vs. IQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXP drawdown since its inception was -50.11%, which is greater than IQM's maximum drawdown of -44.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXP and IQM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXP | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.11% | -44.91% | -5.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.26% | -14.71% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.30% | -44.91% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.75% | -6.86% | -1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.98% | -12.55% | +0.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 4.72% | -1.33% |
Volatility
IXP vs. IQM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) is 5.86%, while Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a volatility of 12.71%. This indicates that IXP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IXP | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 12.71% | -6.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.16% | 23.53% | -12.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.32% | 33.40% | -15.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 28.67% | -9.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.50% | 30.73% | -12.23% |