IXP vs. HERO
IXP (iShares Global Comm Services ETF) and HERO (Global X Video Games & Esports ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - IXP tracks the S&P Global 1200 Communication Services 4.5/22.5/45 Capped while HERO tracks the Solactive Video Games & Esports Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IXP returned 8.32%/yr vs -1.39%/yr for HERO. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IXP charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HERO.
Performance
IXP vs. HERO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IXP achieves a -1.64% return, which is significantly higher than HERO's -10.56% return.
IXP
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- 3.30%
- 6M
- -5.05%
- YTD
- -1.64%
- 1Y
- 9.01%
- 3Y*
- 21.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.65%
HERO
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- 6M
- -9.80%
- YTD
- -10.56%
- 1Y
- -13.47%
- 3Y*
- 10.27%
- 5Y*
- -1.39%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $881.17K | $612.17K | $690.19K | |
| $6.29M | $4.27M | $3.74M |
IXP vs. HERO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXP iShares Global Comm Services ETF | -1.64% | 29.27% | 31.33% | 38.80% | -33.40% | 12.77% | 22.16% | 5.77% |
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | -10.56% | 28.74% | 17.65% | 8.36% | -33.42% | -8.37% | 91.02% | 9.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between IXP and HERO is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019 | 0.67 |
The correlation between IXP and HERO shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IXP vs. HERO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IXP
HERO
Communication Services
Technology
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
IXP
HERO
Technology
IXP
HERO
Real Estate
IXP
HERO
-
Consumer Cyclical
IXP
HERO
-
Basic Materials
IXP
-
HERO
-
Consumer Defensive
IXP
-
HERO
-
Energy
IXP
-
HERO
-
Financial Services
IXP
-
HERO
-
Healthcare
IXP
-
HERO
-
Industrials
IXP
-
HERO
Utilities
IXP
-
HERO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IXP vs. HERO — Risk / Return Rank
IXP
HERO
IXP vs. HERO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) and Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IXP | HERO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.90 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | -0.44 | +1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.92 | -0.76 | +2.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IXP vs. HERO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXP drawdown since its inception was -50.11%, smaller than the maximum HERO drawdown of -54.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXP and HERO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXP | HERO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.11% | -54.02% | +3.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.26% | -30.78% | +18.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.54% | -30.78% | +13.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.30% | -46.42% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.75% | -24.74% | +18.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.89% | -26.02% | +14.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.70% | 17.64% | -12.94% |
Volatility
IXP vs. HERO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) is 6.73%, while Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that IXP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HERO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IXP | HERO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.73% | 7.39% | -0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.41% | 16.13% | -3.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.10% | 20.63% | -4.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.26% | 23.48% | -4.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.59% | 24.45% | -5.86% |
IXP vs. HERO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXP has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than HERO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IXP vs. HERO - Dividend Comparison
IXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than HERO's 1.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | 1.74% | 1.62% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.28% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IXP iShares Global Comm Services ETF | 3.32% | 2.98% | 1.35% | 1.24% | 0.62% | 1.80% | 0.95% | 2.18% | 4.32% | 3.41% | 4.02% | 3.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IXP and HERO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HERO has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to IXP (6.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXP dropped -50.11% vs HERO's -54.02%.
On 5-year performance, IXP leads with 8.32% vs -1.39% for HERO. On fees, IXP is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, IXP has been the lower-risk option at 6.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IXP has performed better with a 8.32% return vs -1.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IXP is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HERO.
IXP has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 1.74% for HERO.
IXP tracks S&P Global 1200 Communication Services 4.5/22.5/45 Capped, while HERO tracks Solactive Video Games & Esports Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IXP and 0.50% for HERO.
IXP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IXP and HERO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer