IXN vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
IXN and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IXN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2001. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. Both IXN and SCHG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IXN or SCHG.
Correlation
The correlation between IXN and SCHG is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IXN vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IXN:
1.30
SCHG:
2.22
IXN:
1.78
SCHG:
2.86
IXN:
1.24
SCHG:
1.40
IXN:
1.68
SCHG:
3.13
IXN:
5.23
SCHG:
12.34
IXN:
5.41%
SCHG:
3.14%
IXN:
21.74%
SCHG:
17.45%
IXN:
-55.67%
SCHG:
-34.59%
IXN:
-2.32%
SCHG:
-2.75%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IXN achieves a 26.11% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 37.04% return. Over the past 10 years, IXN has outperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 19.23%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively lower 16.77% annualized return.
IXN
26.11%
3.92%
3.11%
26.79%
20.49%
19.23%
SCHG
37.04%
3.40%
12.88%
37.14%
20.24%
16.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IXN vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXN has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IXN vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IXN vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
IXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, more than SCHG's 0.41% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 0.42% | 0.55% | 0.81% | 0.58% | 0.63% | 1.06% | 0.94% | 0.93% | 1.03% | 1.12% | 1.14% | 1.02% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
IXN vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXN drawdown since its inception was -55.67%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXN and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IXN vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 4.88% and 5.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.