PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXC vs. XES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXC vs. XES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXC achieves a 32.22% return, which is significantly lower than XES's 50.69% return. Over the past 10 years, IXC has outperformed XES with an annualized return of 10.29%, while XES has yielded a comparatively lower -2.47% annualized return.


IXC

1D
0.87%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
32.22%
6M
30.00%
1Y
48.10%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
19.64%
10Y*
10.29%

XES

1D
-0.56%
1M
-4.59%
YTD
50.69%
6M
43.67%
1Y
97.14%
3Y*
19.81%
5Y*
13.75%
10Y*
-2.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXC vs. XES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
32.22%13.98%1.95%3.92%48.51%40.88%-31.00%12.67%-14.85%5.54%
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
50.69%5.89%-5.44%6.68%62.03%12.00%-43.38%-9.00%-46.99%-21.93%

Correlation

The correlation between IXC and XES is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2006

0.85

The correlation between IXC and XES shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IXC vs. XES - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IXC
XES

Energy

100.0%
97.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

2.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

IXC
100.0%
XES
97.5%

Basic Materials

IXC

-

XES

-

Communication Services

IXC

-

XES

-

Consumer Cyclical

IXC

-

XES

-

Consumer Defensive

IXC

-

XES

-

Financial Services

IXC

-

XES

-

Healthcare

IXC

-

XES

-

Industrials

IXC

-

XES
2.5%

Real Estate

IXC

-

XES

-

Technology

IXC

-

XES

-

Utilities

IXC

-

XES

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXC vs. XES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXC
IXC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
IXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

XES
XES Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
XES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XES Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XES Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XES Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
XES Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXC vs. XES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IXCXESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.48

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.00

9.93

-4.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.10

26.79

-11.69

IXC vs. XES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXC Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the XES Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXC and XES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IXCXESDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

3.23

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.35

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

-0.05

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

-0.07

+0.39

Drawdowns

IXC vs. XES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXC drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, smaller than the maximum XES drawdown of -95.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXC and XES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXCXESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.88%

-95.65%

+27.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-9.84%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

-45.95%

+26.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.93%

-45.95%

+21.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.16%

-91.23%

+27.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.84%

-70.90%

+66.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.48%

-54.36%

+36.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

3.64%

-0.44%

Volatility

IXC vs. XES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) is 7.50%, while SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that IXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXCXESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.50%

8.22%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.42%

20.52%

-5.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.75%

30.50%

-11.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.50%

39.04%

-15.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.85%

45.04%

-18.19%

IXC vs. XES - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXC has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than XES's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXC vs. XES - Dividend Comparison

IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than XES's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
2.79%3.68%4.56%3.45%4.76%3.98%4.86%7.00%3.51%3.05%2.86%3.77%
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
1.12%1.69%1.31%0.66%0.36%1.81%1.33%1.43%1.14%1.68%0.64%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


IXC and XES have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XES has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to IXC (7.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXC dropped -67.88% vs XES's -95.65%.

On 10-year performance, IXC leads with 10.29% vs -2.47% for XES. On fees, XES is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IXC has been the lower-risk option at 7.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IXC has performed better with a 10.29% return vs -2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XES is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXC.

IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 1.12% for XES.

IXC tracks S&P Global Energy Sector Index, while XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXC and 0.35% for XES.

XES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXC and XES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer