IWY vs. VT
IWY (iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Top 200 Growth Index, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWY returned 19.59%/yr vs 13.03%/yr for VT. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWY charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
IWY vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWY achieves a 5.40% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 12.78% return. Over the past 10 years, IWY has outperformed VT with an annualized return of 19.59%, while VT has yielded a comparatively lower 13.03% annualized return.
IWY
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- 5.40%
- 6M
- 6.65%
- 1Y
- 24.23%
- 3Y*
- 23.50%
- 5Y*
- 15.67%
- 10Y*
- 19.59%
VT
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- 3.39%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 6M
- 13.56%
- 1Y
- 29.41%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.03%
IWY vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 5.40% | 18.19% | 34.89% | 46.49% | -29.91% | 31.05% | 39.01% | 36.20% | -0.72% | 31.69% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 12.78% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWY and VT is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2009 | 0.87 |
The correlation between IWY and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
IWY vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWY
VT
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
IWY
VT
Communication Services
IWY
VT
Consumer Cyclical
IWY
VT
Healthcare
IWY
VT
Financial Services
IWY
VT
Industrials
IWY
VT
Consumer Defensive
IWY
VT
Utilities
IWY
VT
Real Estate
IWY
VT
Basic Materials
IWY
VT
Energy
IWY
VT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWY vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
IWY
VT
IWY vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWY | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.40 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 3.05 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.70 | 13.29 | -8.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWY vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWY drawdown since its inception was -32.68%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWY and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWY | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.68% | -50.27% | +17.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.63% | -9.67% | -6.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.22% | -16.51% | -6.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.68% | -26.38% | -6.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.68% | -34.24% | +1.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.47% | -0.40% | -3.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.75% | -7.01% | +2.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.17% | 2.22% | +2.95% |
Volatility
IWY vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) have volatilities of 5.68% and 5.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWY | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.68% | 5.46% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.59% | 11.11% | +1.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.14% | 13.41% | +2.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.57% | 16.17% | +5.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 17.28% | +3.75% |
IWY vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWY has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWY vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
IWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than VT's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.42% | 0.68% | 0.88% | 0.50% | 0.71% | 1.06% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.58% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWY and VT have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWY has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to VT (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWY dropped -32.68% vs VT's -50.27%.
On 10-year performance, IWY leads with 19.59% vs 13.03% for VT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 5.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWY has performed better with a 19.59% return vs 13.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWY.
VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.43% for IWY.
IWY is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VT is Global Equities. IWY tracks Russell Top 200 Growth Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWY and 0.06% for VT.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWY and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer