IWY vs. MOTI
IWY (iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF) and MOTI (VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Top 200 Growth Index, while MOTI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global ex-US Moat Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWY returned 19.31%/yr vs 6.45%/yr for MOTI. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWY charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for MOTI.
Performance
IWY vs. MOTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWY achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly higher than MOTI's -10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, IWY has outperformed MOTI with an annualized return of 19.31%, while MOTI has yielded a comparatively lower 6.45% annualized return.
IWY
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- 1.19%
- 6M
- -0.22%
- 1Y
- 16.91%
- 3Y*
- 22.20%
- 5Y*
- 14.11%
- 10Y*
- 19.31%
MOTI
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -5.79%
- YTD
- -10.36%
- 6M
- -10.04%
- 1Y
- -1.05%
- 3Y*
- 5.51%
- 5Y*
- 1.61%
- 10Y*
- 6.45%
IWY vs. MOTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 1.19% | 18.19% | 34.89% | 46.49% | -29.91% | 31.05% | 39.01% | 36.20% | -0.72% | 31.69% |
MOTI VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF | -10.36% | 25.01% | 1.94% | 10.18% | -6.93% | 0.03% | 7.24% | 17.63% | -13.92% | 34.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWY and MOTI is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015 | 0.55 |
The correlation between IWY and MOTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (3 years) to 0.57 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IWY vs. MOTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWY
MOTI
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Technology
IWY
MOTI
Communication Services
IWY
MOTI
Consumer Cyclical
IWY
MOTI
Healthcare
IWY
MOTI
Financial Services
IWY
MOTI
Industrials
IWY
MOTI
Consumer Defensive
IWY
MOTI
Utilities
IWY
MOTI
-
Real Estate
IWY
MOTI
-
Basic Materials
IWY
MOTI
Energy
IWY
MOTI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWY vs. MOTI — Risk / Return Rank
IWY
MOTI
IWY vs. MOTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWY | MOTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.00 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | -0.07 | +1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.23 | -0.16 | +3.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWY vs. MOTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWY drawdown since its inception was -32.68%, smaller than the maximum MOTI drawdown of -36.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWY and MOTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWY | MOTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.68% | -36.70% | +4.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.63% | -15.61% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.22% | -16.35% | -6.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.68% | -28.77% | -3.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.68% | -36.70% | +4.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.33% | -15.61% | +8.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.75% | -9.15% | +4.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.24% | 6.51% | -1.27% |
Volatility
IWY vs. MOTI - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) at 3.06%. This indicates that IWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWY | MOTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.07% | 3.06% | +3.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.54% | 11.08% | +1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.28% | 14.41% | +1.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.60% | 17.54% | +4.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.02% | 17.82% | +3.20% |
IWY vs. MOTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWY has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MOTI's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWY vs. MOTI - Dividend Comparison
IWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than MOTI's 3.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.36% | 0.42% | 0.68% | 0.88% | 0.50% | 0.71% | 1.06% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.58% |
MOTI VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF | 3.60% | 3.22% | 4.79% | 2.34% | 3.27% | 4.67% | 2.14% | 3.90% | 3.73% | 8.87% | 1.33% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWY and MOTI have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWY has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to MOTI (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWY dropped -32.68% vs MOTI's -36.70%.
On 10-year performance, IWY leads with 19.31% vs 6.45% for MOTI. On fees, IWY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, MOTI has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWY has performed better with a 19.31% return vs 6.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for MOTI.
MOTI has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 0.36% for IWY.
IWY is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MOTI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IWY tracks Russell Top 200 Growth Index, while MOTI tracks Morningstar Global ex-US Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWY and 0.57% for MOTI.
IWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWY and MOTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer