IWY vs. HLAL

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

IWY (iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF) and HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - IWY tracks the Russell Top 200 Growth Index while HLAL tracks the FTSE Shariah USA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IWY returned 14.13%/yr vs 14.58%/yr for HLAL. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWY charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HLAL.

Performance

IWY vs. HLAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWY achieves a 4.73% return, which is significantly lower than HLAL's 16.10% return.

IWY

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -0.64%
• 6M: 5.82%
• YTD: 4.73%
• 1Y: 16.39%
• 3Y*: 21.97%
• 5Y*: 14.13%
• 10Y*: 19.00%

HLAL

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: -0.59%
• 6M: 14.53%
• YTD: 16.10%
• 1Y: 34.29%
• 3Y*: 19.13%
• 5Y*: 14.58%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWY vs. HLAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF	4.73%	18.19%	34.89%	46.49%	-29.91%	31.05%	39.01%	9.52%
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF	16.10%	18.30%	16.70%	30.13%	-17.56%	28.64%	24.65%	10.61%

Correlation

The correlation between IWY and HLAL is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019	0.91

The correlation between IWY and HLAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWY vs. HLAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWY	HLAL
Technology	55.7%	51.2%
Communication Services	17.2%	16.8%
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	5.6%
Industrials	6.7%	5.2%
Healthcare	4.8%	10.4%
Financial Services	4.6%	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	1.2%	2.9%
Utilities	1.1%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.2%	0.8%
Basic Materials	0.1%	2.5%
Energy	0.0%	4.4%

Return for Risk

IWY vs. HLAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWY

IWY Risk / Return Rank: 29
IWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
IWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
IWY Omega Ratio Rank: 30
IWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
IWY Martin Ratio Rank: 27

HLAL

HLAL Risk / Return Rank: 85
HLAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
HLAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
HLAL Omega Ratio Rank: 86
HLAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
HLAL Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWY vs. HLAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWY	HLAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	2.34	-1.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	3.20	-1.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.41	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.99	3.38	-2.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.04	13.51	-10.47

IWY vs. HLAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWY Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the HLAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWY and HLAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IWY vs. HLAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWY drawdown since its inception was -32.68%, roughly equal to the maximum HLAL drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWY and HLAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWY	HLAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.68%	-33.57%	+0.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.63%	-10.20%	-6.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.22%	-21.67%	-1.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.68%	-23.18%	-9.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.09%	-2.28%	-1.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.75%	-4.98%	+0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.40%	2.54%	+2.86%

Volatility

IWY vs. HLAL - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) has a higher volatility of 6.69% compared to Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) at 5.62%. This indicates that IWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWY	HLAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.69%	5.62%	+1.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.52%	12.10%	+1.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.90%	14.73%	+2.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.71%	17.86%	+3.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.06%	20.23%	+0.83%

IWY vs. HLAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWY has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than HLAL's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWY vs. HLAL - Dividend Comparison

IWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than HLAL's 0.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF	0.45%	0.53%	0.58%	0.72%	1.15%	0.78%	0.97%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF	0.35%	0.36%	0.42%	0.68%	0.88%	0.50%	0.71%	1.06%	1.32%	1.26%	1.51%	1.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWY and HLAL in my portfolio?

IWY and HLAL have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IWY or HLAL?

IWY has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to HLAL (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWY dropped -32.68% vs HLAL's -33.57%.

Which ETF is better, IWY or HLAL?

On 5-year performance, HLAL leads with 14.58% vs 14.13% for IWY. On fees, IWY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, HLAL has been the lower-risk option at 5.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IWY or HLAL?

Over the 5-year period, HLAL has performed better with a 14.58% return vs 14.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWY or HLAL?

IWY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HLAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWY or HLAL?

HLAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.35% for IWY.

What is the main difference between IWY and HLAL?

IWY tracks Russell Top 200 Growth Index, while HLAL tracks FTSE Shariah USA Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWY and 0.50% for HLAL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HLAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.