PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWY vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWY vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWY achieves a 7.20% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 10.60% return.


IWY

1D
-1.41%
1M
5.83%
YTD
7.20%
6M
6.65%
1Y
26.69%
3Y*
25.47%
5Y*
16.45%
10Y*
19.57%

BBUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.60%
6M
10.47%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWY vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
7.20%18.19%34.89%46.49%-29.91%31.05%39.01%20.55%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
10.60%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.53%

Correlation

The correlation between IWY and BBUS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019

0.93

The correlation between IWY and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWY vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWY
BBUS

Technology

54.9%
37.1%

Communication Services

13.9%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
9.4%

Healthcare

6.6%
8.1%

Financial Services

5.6%
10.8%

Industrials

4.0%
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
4.5%

Utilities

1.1%
2.6%

Real Estate

0.3%
1.7%

Basic Materials

0.3%
1.2%

Energy

0.0%
3.2%

Technology

IWY
54.9%
BBUS
37.1%

Communication Services

IWY
13.9%
BBUS
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IWY
11.4%
BBUS
9.4%

Healthcare

IWY
6.6%
BBUS
8.1%

Financial Services

IWY
5.6%
BBUS
10.8%

Industrials

IWY
4.0%
BBUS
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

IWY
3.0%
BBUS
4.5%

Utilities

IWY
1.1%
BBUS
2.6%

Real Estate

IWY
0.3%
BBUS
1.7%

Basic Materials

IWY
0.3%
BBUS
1.2%

Energy

IWY
0.0%
BBUS
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWY vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWY
IWY Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWY Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
IWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWY Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWY vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWYBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.42

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

3.00

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.26

13.76

-8.50

IWY vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWY Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWY and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWYBBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

2.33

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.79

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.84

+0.09

Drawdowns

IWY vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWY drawdown since its inception was -32.68%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWY and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWYBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.68%

-35.35%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.63%

-9.21%

-7.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.22%

-19.01%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.68%

-25.46%

-7.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-0.74%

-1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.75%

-5.46%

+0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.09%

2.00%

+3.09%

Volatility

IWY vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that IWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWYBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

2.88%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.65%

8.96%

+2.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.54%

11.87%

+3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.48%

17.03%

+4.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.97%

19.59%

+1.38%

IWY vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWY has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWY vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

IWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
0.33%0.36%0.42%0.68%0.88%0.50%0.71%1.06%1.32%1.26%1.51%1.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, IWY and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IWY has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWY dropped -32.68% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, IWY leads with 16.45% vs 13.43% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IWY has performed better with a 16.45% return vs 13.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWY.

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.33% for IWY.

IWY tracks Russell Top 200 Growth Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWY and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWY and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer