IWV vs. XLP

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

IWV (iShares Russell 3000 ETF) and XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 3000 Index, while XLP is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWV returned 14.84%/yr vs 7.60%/yr for XLP. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLP.

Performance

IWV vs. XLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWV achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly lower than XLP's 11.10% return. Over the past 10 years, IWV has outperformed XLP with an annualized return of 14.84%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.60% annualized return.

IWV

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: -0.32%
• YTD: 9.30%
• 6M: 9.38%
• 1Y: 25.70%
• 3Y*: 20.32%
• 5Y*: 12.07%
• 10Y*: 14.84%

XLP

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 0.99%
• YTD: 11.10%
• 6M: 9.54%
• 1Y: 8.93%
• 3Y*: 8.26%
• 5Y*: 6.65%
• 10Y*: 7.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWV vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF	9.30%	16.96%	23.49%	25.82%	-19.28%	25.54%	20.55%	30.66%	-5.43%	20.97%
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF	11.10%	1.52%	12.20%	-0.82%	-0.81%	17.20%	10.11%	27.43%	-8.07%	12.98%

Correlation

The correlation between IWV and XLP is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2000	0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between IWV and XLP has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IWV vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWV	XLP
Technology	33.1%	-
Financial Services	12.2%	-
Communication Services	10.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	1.0%
Industrials	9.6%	-
Healthcare	9.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	99.0%
Energy	3.8%	-
Real Estate	2.4%	-
Utilities	2.3%	-
Basic Materials	2.2%	-

Return for Risk

IWV vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWV

IWV Risk / Return Rank: 68
IWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
IWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
IWV Omega Ratio Rank: 68
IWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
IWV Martin Ratio Rank: 75

XLP

XLP Risk / Return Rank: 19
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 18
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWV vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWV	XLP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	0.59	+1.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	0.94	+1.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.11	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.74	0.79	+1.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.28	1.52	+10.76

IWV vs. XLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWV Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the XLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWV and XLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IWV vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWV drawdown since its inception was -55.61%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWV and XLP.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWV	XLP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.61%	-35.90%	-19.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.89%	-9.69%	+0.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.28%	-12.39%	-6.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.11%	-16.30%	-8.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.22%	-24.51%	-10.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.09%	-4.12%	+2.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.58%	-7.06%	-3.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.98%	5.01%	-3.03%

Volatility

IWV vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) have volatilities of 4.44% and 4.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWV	XLP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.44%	4.53%	-0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.75%	10.14%	-0.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.57%	12.90%	-0.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.30%	13.34%	+3.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.43%	14.75%	+3.68%

IWV vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IWV vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison

IWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than XLP's 2.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF	0.87%	0.96%	1.08%	1.30%	1.56%	1.04%	1.30%	1.69%	1.97%	1.58%	1.79%	1.99%
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF	2.53%	2.75%	2.77%	2.63%	2.47%	2.28%	2.50%	2.57%	3.04%	2.62%	2.53%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWV and XLP in my portfolio?

IWV and XLP have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IWV or XLP?

XLP has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to IWV (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWV dropped -55.61% vs XLP's -35.90%.

Which ETF is better, IWV or XLP?

On 10-year performance, IWV leads with 14.84% vs 7.60% for XLP. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IWV or XLP?

Over the 10-year period, IWV has performed better with a 14.84% return vs 7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWV or XLP?

XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWV or XLP?

XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 0.87% for IWV.

What is the main difference between IWV and XLP?

IWV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XLP is Consumer Staples Equities. IWV tracks Russell 3000 Index, while XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWV and 0.08% for XLP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.