PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWS vs. VO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWS vs. VO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWS achieves a 19.27% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 11.87% return. Over the past 10 years, IWS has underperformed VO with an annualized return of 10.22%, while VO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.40% annualized return.


IWS

1D
1.13%
1M
2.13%
6M
13.10%
YTD
19.27%
1Y
26.94%
3Y*
15.91%
5Y*
10.00%
10Y*
10.22%

VO

1D
0.20%
1M
0.27%
6M
7.77%
YTD
11.87%
1Y
16.46%
3Y*
14.33%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*
11.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWS vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
19.27%10.82%12.91%12.52%-12.29%28.10%4.83%26.73%-12.43%13.14%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
11.87%11.62%15.31%16.03%-18.73%24.70%18.10%30.98%-9.24%19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between IWS and VO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.95

The correlation between IWS and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWS vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWS
VO

Technology

18.7%
21.7%

Industrials

16.2%
17.3%

Financial Services

13.7%
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
8.6%

Real Estate

8.3%
5.1%

Healthcare

7.6%
7.5%

Energy

7.4%
7.9%

Utilities

6.6%
7.9%

Basic Materials

5.3%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.7%

Communication Services

3.1%
2.2%

Technology

IWS
18.7%
VO
21.7%

Industrials

IWS
16.2%
VO
17.3%

Financial Services

IWS
13.7%
VO
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IWS
8.5%
VO
8.6%

Real Estate

IWS
8.3%
VO
5.1%

Healthcare

IWS
7.6%
VO
7.5%

Energy

IWS
7.4%
VO
7.9%

Utilities

IWS
6.6%
VO
7.9%

Basic Materials

IWS
5.3%
VO
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

IWS
4.7%
VO
4.7%

Communication Services

IWS
3.1%
VO
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWS vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWS
IWS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

VO
VO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWS vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWSVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.23

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.59

2.02

+1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.50

7.64

+5.87

IWS vs. VO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWS Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the VO Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWS and VO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWS vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWS drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, which is greater than VO's maximum drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWS and VO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWSVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

-58.87%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-8.17%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.57%

-19.02%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.23%

-27.57%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.83%

-39.37%

-4.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.41%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.98%

-7.82%

-0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

2.16%

-0.16%

Volatility

IWS vs. VO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) has a higher volatility of 3.57% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 2.56%. This indicates that IWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWSVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

2.56%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.07%

9.62%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.50%

12.66%

+0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.31%

17.64%

-0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.30%

18.86%

+0.44%

IWS vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWS has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWS vs. VO - Dividend Comparison

IWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than VO's 1.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.30%1.53%1.50%1.76%1.93%1.39%1.87%1.97%2.53%1.96%2.10%2.14%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.33%1.52%1.49%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, IWS and VO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IWS has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to VO (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWS dropped -62.40% vs VO's -58.87%.

On 10-year performance, VO leads with 11.40% vs 10.22% for IWS. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 11.40% return vs 10.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWS.

VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 1.30% for IWS.

IWS is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VO is Mid Cap Blend Equities. IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for IWS and 0.03% for VO.

IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWS and VO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer