IWR vs. FSMDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IWR (iShares Russell Midcap ETF) and FSMDX (Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund) are both funds - IWR is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Index, while FSMDX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, IWR returned 11.55%/yr vs 11.69%/yr for FSMDX. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IWR charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for FSMDX.

Performance

IWR vs. FSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IWR having a 12.43% return and FSMDX slightly higher at 12.78%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWR having a 11.55% annualized return and FSMDX not far ahead at 11.69%.

IWR

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 3.79%
• YTD: 12.43%
• 6M: 12.21%
• 1Y: 21.66%
• 3Y*: 17.25%
• 5Y*: 8.00%
• 10Y*: 11.55%

FSMDX

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 4.12%
• YTD: 12.78%
• 6M: 12.57%
• 1Y: 22.14%
• 3Y*: 17.58%
• 5Y*: 8.41%
• 10Y*: 11.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWR vs. FSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF	12.43%	10.37%	15.21%	17.05%	-17.48%	22.44%	16.93%	30.23%	-9.10%	18.25%
FSMDX Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund	12.78%	10.58%	15.55%	17.20%	-17.27%	22.56%	17.13%	30.53%	-9.38%	18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between IWR and FSMDX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	1.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2011	1.00

The correlation between IWR and FSMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IWR vs. FSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWR

IWR Risk / Return Rank: 49
IWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
IWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
IWR Omega Ratio Rank: 44
IWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
IWR Martin Ratio Rank: 58

FSMDX

FSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 43
FSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
FSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
FSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
FSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
FSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWR vs. FSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IWR	FSMDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	1.75	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	2.51	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.30	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	2.87	-0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.28	11.06	-0.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWR vs. FSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWR Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the FSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWR and FSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IWR	FSMDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.63	1.75	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	0.46	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	0.61	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.70	-0.20

Drawdowns

IWR vs. FSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWR drawdown since its inception was -58.78%, which is greater than FSMDX's maximum drawdown of -40.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWR and FSMDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWR	FSMDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.78%	-40.35%	-18.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.17%	-8.16%	-0.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.09%	-20.92%	-0.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.18%	-26.07%	-0.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.59%	-40.35%	-0.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	0.00%	-0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.80%	-4.96%	-2.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.11%	2.11%	0.00%

Volatility

IWR vs. FSMDX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) have volatilities of 3.26% and 3.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWR	FSMDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.26%	3.31%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.84%	9.93%	-0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.39%	13.42%	-0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.23%	18.26%	-0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.36%	19.32%	+0.04%

IWR vs. FSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWR has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMDX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IWR vs. FSMDX - Dividend Comparison

IWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than FSMDX's 0.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSMDX Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund	0.98%	1.10%	2.46%	1.39%	2.07%	3.35%	2.34%	2.86%	2.21%	2.17%	2.23%	2.84%
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF	1.15%	1.29%	1.27%	1.43%	1.59%	1.04%	1.28%	1.43%	1.98%	1.52%	1.72%	1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWR and FSMDX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, IWR and FSMDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, IWR or FSMDX?

FSMDX has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to IWR (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWR dropped -58.78% vs FSMDX's -40.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.