IWN vs. SCHD
IWN (iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWN is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWN returned 10.58%/yr vs 12.91%/yr for SCHD. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWN charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
IWN vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IWN having a 20.82% return and SCHD slightly lower at 20.66%. Over the past 10 years, IWN has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 10.58%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.91% annualized return.
IWN
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 20.82%
- 6M
- 17.48%
- 1Y
- 42.26%
- 3Y*
- 17.41%
- 5Y*
- 6.89%
- 10Y*
- 10.58%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 26.16%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
IWN vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 20.82% | 12.40% | 7.63% | 14.56% | -14.77% | 27.96% | 4.66% | 22.01% | -13.01% | 7.69% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 20.66% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWN and SCHD is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.79 |
The correlation between IWN and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IWN vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWN
SCHD
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Financial Services
IWN
SCHD
Technology
IWN
SCHD
Industrials
IWN
SCHD
Real Estate
IWN
SCHD
-
Energy
IWN
SCHD
Healthcare
IWN
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
IWN
SCHD
Utilities
IWN
SCHD
Basic Materials
IWN
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
IWN
SCHD
Communication Services
IWN
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWN vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
IWN
SCHD
IWN vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWN | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.43 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.02 | 5.70 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.91 | 13.97 | +2.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWN vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWN and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWN | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.55% | -33.37% | -28.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.45% | -4.61% | -3.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.70% | -16.13% | -10.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.70% | -16.85% | -9.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.08% | -33.37% | -12.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.03% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.15% | -3.31% | -6.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 1.89% | +0.62% |
Volatility
IWN vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.05%. This indicates that IWN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWN | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 3.05% | +2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.25% | 7.53% | +4.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.09% | 10.93% | +7.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.47% | 14.38% | +7.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.41% | 16.72% | +6.69% |
IWN vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWN has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWN vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
IWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than SCHD's 3.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.42% | 1.70% | 1.80% | 2.04% | 2.12% | 1.48% | 1.60% | 1.92% | 1.99% | 1.78% | 1.74% | 2.15% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.22% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWN and SCHD have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWN has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to SCHD (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWN dropped -61.55% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.91% vs 10.58% for IWN. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 10.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for IWN.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 1.42% for IWN.
IWN is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. IWN tracks Russell 2000 Value Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for IWN and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWN and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer