PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWN vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWN vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IWN having a 20.82% return and SCHD slightly lower at 20.66%. Over the past 10 years, IWN has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 10.58%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.91% annualized return.


IWN

1D
1.17%
1M
4.34%
YTD
20.82%
6M
17.48%
1Y
42.26%
3Y*
17.41%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*
10.58%

SCHD

1D
0.89%
1M
3.37%
YTD
20.66%
6M
19.57%
1Y
26.16%
3Y*
14.90%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
12.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWN vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWN
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
20.82%12.40%7.63%14.56%-14.77%27.96%4.66%22.01%-13.01%7.69%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
20.66%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between IWN and SCHD is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.79

The correlation between IWN and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IWN vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWN
SCHD

Financial Services

24.2%
9.3%

Technology

12.4%
16.4%

Industrials

11.1%
7.5%

Real Estate

10.2%

-

Energy

9.2%
16.2%

Healthcare

8.8%
18.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
6.3%

Utilities

5.7%
0.0%

Basic Materials

5.4%
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
19.2%

Communication Services

1.6%
6.3%

Financial Services

IWN
24.2%
SCHD
9.3%

Technology

IWN
12.4%
SCHD
16.4%

Industrials

IWN
11.1%
SCHD
7.5%

Real Estate

IWN
10.2%
SCHD

-

Energy

IWN
9.2%
SCHD
16.2%

Healthcare

IWN
8.8%
SCHD
18.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IWN
8.7%
SCHD
6.3%

Utilities

IWN
5.7%
SCHD
0.0%

Basic Materials

IWN
5.4%
SCHD
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

IWN
2.0%
SCHD
19.2%

Communication Services

IWN
1.6%
SCHD
6.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWN vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWN
IWN Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWN Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
IWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWN Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWN vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWNSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.43

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.02

5.70

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.91

13.97

+2.95

IWN vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWN Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWN and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWN vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWN and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWNSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.55%

-33.37%

-28.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.45%

-4.61%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.70%

-16.13%

-10.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.70%

-16.85%

-9.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.08%

-33.37%

-12.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.03%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.15%

-3.31%

-6.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

1.89%

+0.62%

Volatility

IWN vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.05%. This indicates that IWN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWNSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.80%

3.05%

+2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.25%

7.53%

+4.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.09%

10.93%

+7.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.47%

14.38%

+7.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.41%

16.72%

+6.69%

IWN vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWN has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWN vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

IWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than SCHD's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWN
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
1.42%1.70%1.80%2.04%2.12%1.48%1.60%1.92%1.99%1.78%1.74%2.15%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.22%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWN and SCHD have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWN has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to SCHD (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWN dropped -61.55% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.91% vs 10.58% for IWN. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 10.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for IWN.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 1.42% for IWN.

IWN is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. IWN tracks Russell 2000 Value Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for IWN and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWN and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer