IWN vs. PDBC
IWN (iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF) and PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWN is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value Index, while PDBC is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. IWN is passively managed, while PDBC is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWN returned 10.17%/yr vs 8.61%/yr for PDBC. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IWN charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PDBC.
Performance
IWN vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWN achieves a 25.00% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 28.15% return. Over the past 10 years, IWN has outperformed PDBC with an annualized return of 10.17%, while PDBC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.61% annualized return.
IWN
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 14.51%
- YTD
- 25.00%
- 1Y
- 42.17%
- 3Y*
- 16.89%
- 5Y*
- 8.91%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.56%
PDBC
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- 6M
- 18.25%
- YTD
- 28.15%
- 1Y
- 35.58%
- 3Y*
- 9.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.02%
- 10Y*
- 8.61%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $172.48M | $133.23M | $145.69M | |
| $121.86M | $152.61M | $122.20M |
IWN vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 25.00% | 12.40% | 7.63% | 14.56% | -14.77% | 27.96% | 4.66% | 22.01% | -13.01% | 7.69% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 28.15% | 5.96% | 2.09% | -6.25% | 19.23% | 41.72% | -7.84% | 11.44% | -12.78% | 5.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWN and PDBC is -0.18, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2014 | 0.27 |
The correlation between IWN and PDBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWN vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank
IWN
PDBC
IWN vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWN | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.31 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.01 | 2.16 | +2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.03 | 7.07 | +10.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWN vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, which is greater than PDBC's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWN and PDBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWN | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.55% | -49.52% | -12.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.45% | -16.55% | +8.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.70% | -16.55% | -10.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.70% | -27.63% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.08% | -40.73% | -5.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -10.21% | +9.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.09% | -23.02% | +12.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 5.05% | -2.70% |
Volatility
IWN vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) is 3.70%, while Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) has a volatility of 7.58%. This indicates that IWN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWN | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | 7.58% | -3.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.86% | 16.65% | -4.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.22% | 19.73% | -2.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.21% | 19.28% | +1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.33% | 17.85% | +5.48% |
IWN vs. PDBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWN has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than PDBC's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWN vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison
IWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than PDBC's 3.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.42% | 1.70% | 1.80% | 2.04% | 2.12% | 1.48% | 1.60% | 1.92% | 1.99% | 1.78% | 1.74% | 2.15% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 3.00% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWN and PDBC have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDBC has higher volatility (7.58%) compared to IWN (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWN dropped -61.55% vs PDBC's -49.52%.
On 10-year performance, IWN leads with 10.17% vs 8.61% for PDBC. On fees, IWN is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, IWN has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWN has performed better with a 10.17% return vs 8.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWN is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDBC.
PDBC has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 1.42% for IWN.
IWN is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while PDBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for IWN and 0.58% for PDBC.
IWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWN and PDBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer