PDBC vs. DJP
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) and iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP).
PDBC and DJP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PDBC is an actively managed fund by Invesco. It was launched on Nov 7, 2014. DJP is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity Index. It was launched on Jun 6, 2006.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PDBC or DJP.
Correlation
The correlation between PDBC and DJP is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PDBC vs. DJP - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PDBC:
-0.34
DJP:
0.32
PDBC:
-0.37
DJP:
0.57
PDBC:
0.96
DJP:
1.07
PDBC:
-0.19
DJP:
0.09
PDBC:
-0.90
DJP:
0.78
PDBC:
5.85%
DJP:
6.49%
PDBC:
15.67%
DJP:
15.84%
PDBC:
-49.52%
DJP:
-78.35%
PDBC:
-23.40%
DJP:
-53.37%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDBC achieves a -1.23% return, which is significantly lower than DJP's 6.26% return. Over the past 10 years, PDBC has outperformed DJP with an annualized return of 2.92%, while DJP has yielded a comparatively lower 1.67% annualized return.
PDBC
-1.23%
-4.82%
-2.18%
-5.62%
16.54%
2.92%
DJP
6.26%
-2.12%
5.57%
5.21%
16.32%
1.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PDBC vs. DJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDBC has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than DJP's 0.70% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PDBC vs. DJP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
PDBC
DJP
PDBC vs. DJP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) and iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PDBC vs. DJP - Dividend Comparison
PDBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, while DJP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 4.48% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% |
DJP iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PDBC vs. DJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDBC drawdown since its inception was -49.52%, smaller than the maximum DJP drawdown of -78.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDBC and DJP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PDBC vs. DJP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) and iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP) have volatilities of 8.22% and 8.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.