IWN vs. MYLD

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

IWN (iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF) and MYLD (Cambria Micro And Smallcap Shareholder Yield ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. IWN is passively managed, while MYLD is actively managed. Over the past year, IWN returned 35.48% vs 36.12% for MYLD. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWN charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MYLD.

Performance

IWN vs. MYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and Cambria Micro And Smallcap Shareholder Yield ETF (MYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IWN having a 22.06% return and MYLD slightly higher at 22.16%.

IWN

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 1.03%
• 6M: 15.43%
• YTD: 22.06%
• 1Y: 35.48%
• 3Y*: 17.20%
• 5Y*: 8.77%
• 10Y*: 10.09%

MYLD

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 1.96%
• 6M: 16.28%
• YTD: 22.16%
• 1Y: 36.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWN vs. MYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF	22.06%	12.40%	10.79%
MYLD Cambria Micro And Smallcap Shareholder Yield ETF	22.16%	10.48%	6.53%

Correlation

The correlation between IWN and MYLD is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2024	0.89

The correlation between IWN and MYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IWN vs. MYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWN

IWN Risk / Return Rank: 83
IWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
IWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
IWN Omega Ratio Rank: 76
IWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IWN Martin Ratio Rank: 87

MYLD

MYLD Risk / Return Rank: 79
MYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
MYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
MYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 77
MYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
MYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWN vs. MYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and Cambria Micro And Smallcap Shareholder Yield ETF (MYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWN	MYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	2.01	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	2.92	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.36	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.22	3.66	+0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.24	10.61	+3.63

IWN vs. MYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWN Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the MYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWN and MYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IWN vs. MYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, which is greater than MYLD's maximum drawdown of -28.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWN and MYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWN	MYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.55%	-28.23%	-33.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.45%	-9.92%	+1.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.88%	0.00%	-0.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.12%	-5.77%	-4.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.50%	3.41%	-0.91%

Volatility

IWN vs. MYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) is 3.77%, while Cambria Micro And Smallcap Shareholder Yield ETF (MYLD) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that IWN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWN	MYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.77%	4.48%	-0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.10%	11.85%	+0.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.67%	18.13%	-0.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.33%	19.76%	+1.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.33%	19.76%	+3.57%

IWN vs. MYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWN has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than MYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWN vs. MYLD - Dividend Comparison

IWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than MYLD's 2.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF	1.45%	1.70%	1.80%	2.04%	2.12%	1.48%	1.60%	1.92%	1.99%	1.78%	1.74%	2.15%
MYLD Cambria Micro And Smallcap Shareholder Yield ETF	2.16%	6.22%	3.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWN and MYLD in my portfolio?

IWN and MYLD have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IWN or MYLD?

MYLD has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to IWN (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWN dropped -61.55% vs MYLD's -28.23%.

Which ETF is better, IWN or MYLD?

On 1-year performance, MYLD leads with 36.12% vs 35.48% for IWN. On fees, IWN is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, IWN has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IWN or MYLD?

Over the 1-year period, MYLD has performed better with a 36.12% return vs 35.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWN or MYLD?

IWN is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWN or MYLD?

MYLD has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 1.45% for IWN.

What is the main difference between IWN and MYLD?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for IWN and 0.59% for MYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.