PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MYLD vs. DFSV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MYLD vs. DFSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Micro And Smallcap Shareholder Yield ETF (MYLD) and Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MYLD having a 17.05% return and DFSV slightly lower at 16.63%.


MYLD

1D
-0.07%
1M
3.47%
YTD
17.05%
6M
15.43%
1Y
39.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DFSV

1D
0.24%
1M
2.16%
YTD
16.63%
6M
14.57%
1Y
34.93%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYLD vs. DFSV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MYLD
Cambria Micro And Smallcap Shareholder Yield ETF
17.05%10.48%6.53%
DFSV
Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF
16.63%8.59%10.31%

Correlation

The correlation between MYLD and DFSV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2024

0.93

The correlation between MYLD and DFSV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MYLD vs. DFSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYLD
MYLD Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
MYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
MYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
MYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
MYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

DFSV
DFSV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DFSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSV Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSV Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYLD vs. DFSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Micro And Smallcap Shareholder Yield ETF (MYLD) and Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MYLDDFSVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.35

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

3.74

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.53

11.89

-0.36

MYLD vs. DFSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the DFSV Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYLD and DFSV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MYLD vs. DFSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYLD drawdown since its inception was -28.23%, roughly equal to the maximum DFSV drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYLD and DFSV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MYLDDFSVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.23%

-28.02%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-9.39%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

-1.95%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.89%

-6.64%

+0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

2.94%

+0.48%

Volatility

MYLD vs. DFSV - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Micro And Smallcap Shareholder Yield ETF (MYLD) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV) at 4.04%. This indicates that MYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MYLDDFSVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

4.04%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.07%

11.27%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.39%

17.63%

+0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.91%

22.20%

-2.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.91%

22.20%

-2.29%

MYLD vs. DFSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than DFSV's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

MYLD vs. DFSV - Dividend Comparison

MYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than DFSV's 1.40% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DFSV
Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF
1.40%1.53%1.31%1.29%0.90%
MYLD
Cambria Micro And Smallcap Shareholder Yield ETF
2.25%6.22%3.26%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, MYLD and DFSV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MYLD has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to DFSV (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYLD dropped -28.23% vs DFSV's -28.02%.

On 1-year performance, MYLD leads with 39.32% vs 34.93% for DFSV. On fees, DFSV is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, DFSV has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MYLD has performed better with a 39.32% return vs 34.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFSV is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MYLD.

MYLD has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 1.40% for DFSV.

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MYLD and 0.31% for DFSV.

MYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MYLD and DFSV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer