IWN vs. FUTY
IWN (iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF) and FUTY (Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWN is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value Index, while FUTY is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWN returned 10.58%/yr vs 9.07%/yr for FUTY. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IWN charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FUTY.
Performance
IWN vs. FUTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWN achieves a 20.82% return, which is significantly higher than FUTY's 4.88% return. Over the past 10 years, IWN has outperformed FUTY with an annualized return of 10.58%, while FUTY has yielded a comparatively lower 9.07% annualized return.
IWN
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 20.82%
- 6M
- 17.48%
- 1Y
- 42.26%
- 3Y*
- 17.41%
- 5Y*
- 6.89%
- 10Y*
- 10.58%
FUTY
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 4.88%
- 6M
- 5.07%
- 1Y
- 11.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.07%
IWN vs. FUTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 20.82% | 12.40% | 7.63% | 14.56% | -14.77% | 27.96% | 4.66% | 22.01% | -13.01% | 7.69% |
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF | 4.88% | 16.40% | 23.20% | -7.46% | 1.12% | 17.53% | -0.80% | 24.89% | 4.36% | 12.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWN and FUTY is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.35 |
IWN vs. FUTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWN
FUTY
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Energy
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
IWN
FUTY
-
Technology
IWN
FUTY
-
Industrials
IWN
FUTY
Real Estate
IWN
FUTY
-
Energy
IWN
FUTY
Healthcare
IWN
FUTY
-
Consumer Cyclical
IWN
FUTY
-
Utilities
IWN
FUTY
Basic Materials
IWN
FUTY
-
Consumer Defensive
IWN
FUTY
-
Communication Services
IWN
FUTY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWN vs. FUTY — Risk / Return Rank
IWN
FUTY
IWN vs. FUTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWN | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.15 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.02 | 1.33 | +3.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.91 | 2.88 | +14.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWN vs. FUTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, which is greater than FUTY's maximum drawdown of -36.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWN and FUTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWN | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.55% | -36.44% | -25.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.45% | -8.93% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.70% | -17.35% | -9.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.70% | -25.11% | -1.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.08% | -36.44% | -9.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.74% | +5.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.15% | -6.03% | -4.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 4.11% | -1.60% |
Volatility
IWN vs. FUTY - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) have volatilities of 5.80% and 5.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWN | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 5.63% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.25% | 11.54% | +0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.09% | 14.43% | +3.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.47% | 17.10% | +4.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.41% | 19.06% | +4.35% |
IWN vs. FUTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWN has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTY's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWN vs. FUTY - Dividend Comparison
IWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than FUTY's 2.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF | 2.57% | 2.67% | 2.96% | 3.31% | 2.72% | 2.70% | 3.07% | 2.82% | 3.11% | 3.03% | 3.35% | 4.33% |
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.42% | 1.70% | 1.80% | 2.04% | 2.12% | 1.48% | 1.60% | 1.92% | 1.99% | 1.78% | 1.74% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWN and FUTY have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWN has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to FUTY (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWN dropped -61.55% vs FUTY's -36.44%.
On 10-year performance, IWN leads with 10.58% vs 9.07% for FUTY. On fees, FUTY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FUTY has been the lower-risk option at 5.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWN has performed better with a 10.58% return vs 9.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FUTY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for IWN.
FUTY has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 1.42% for IWN.
IWN is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while FUTY is Utilities Equities. IWN tracks Russell 2000 Value Index, while FUTY tracks MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for IWN and 0.08% for FUTY.
IWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWN and FUTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer