PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWN vs. FUTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWN vs. FUTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWN achieves a 20.82% return, which is significantly higher than FUTY's 4.88% return. Over the past 10 years, IWN has outperformed FUTY with an annualized return of 10.58%, while FUTY has yielded a comparatively lower 9.07% annualized return.


IWN

1D
1.17%
1M
4.34%
YTD
20.82%
6M
17.48%
1Y
42.26%
3Y*
17.41%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*
10.58%

FUTY

1D
1.14%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
4.88%
6M
5.07%
1Y
11.80%
3Y*
13.69%
5Y*
9.19%
10Y*
9.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWN vs. FUTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWN
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
20.82%12.40%7.63%14.56%-14.77%27.96%4.66%22.01%-13.01%7.69%
FUTY
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
4.88%16.40%23.20%-7.46%1.12%17.53%-0.80%24.89%4.36%12.52%

Correlation

The correlation between IWN and FUTY is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.35

IWN vs. FUTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWN
FUTY

Financial Services

24.2%

-

Technology

12.4%

-

Industrials

11.1%
0.2%

Real Estate

10.2%

-

Energy

9.2%
0.5%

Healthcare

8.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%

-

Utilities

5.7%
99.2%

Basic Materials

5.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.0%

-

Communication Services

1.6%

-

Financial Services

IWN
24.2%
FUTY

-

Technology

IWN
12.4%
FUTY

-

Industrials

IWN
11.1%
FUTY
0.2%

Real Estate

IWN
10.2%
FUTY

-

Energy

IWN
9.2%
FUTY
0.5%

Healthcare

IWN
8.8%
FUTY

-

Consumer Cyclical

IWN
8.7%
FUTY

-

Utilities

IWN
5.7%
FUTY
99.2%

Basic Materials

IWN
5.4%
FUTY

-

Consumer Defensive

IWN
2.0%
FUTY

-

Communication Services

IWN
1.6%
FUTY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWN vs. FUTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWN
IWN Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWN Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
IWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWN Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

FUTY
FUTY Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FUTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUTY Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FUTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWN vs. FUTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWNFUTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.15

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.02

1.33

+3.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.91

2.88

+14.03

IWN vs. FUTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWN Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the FUTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWN and FUTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWN vs. FUTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, which is greater than FUTY's maximum drawdown of -36.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWN and FUTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWNFUTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.55%

-36.44%

-25.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.45%

-8.93%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.70%

-17.35%

-9.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.70%

-25.11%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.08%

-36.44%

-9.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.74%

+5.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.15%

-6.03%

-4.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

4.11%

-1.60%

Volatility

IWN vs. FUTY - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) have volatilities of 5.80% and 5.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWNFUTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.80%

5.63%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.25%

11.54%

+0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.09%

14.43%

+3.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.47%

17.10%

+4.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.41%

19.06%

+4.35%

IWN vs. FUTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWN has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTY's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWN vs. FUTY - Dividend Comparison

IWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than FUTY's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUTY
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
2.57%2.67%2.96%3.31%2.72%2.70%3.07%2.82%3.11%3.03%3.35%4.33%
IWN
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
1.42%1.70%1.80%2.04%2.12%1.48%1.60%1.92%1.99%1.78%1.74%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWN and FUTY have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWN has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to FUTY (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWN dropped -61.55% vs FUTY's -36.44%.

On 10-year performance, IWN leads with 10.58% vs 9.07% for FUTY. On fees, FUTY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FUTY has been the lower-risk option at 5.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWN has performed better with a 10.58% return vs 9.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FUTY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for IWN.

FUTY has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 1.42% for IWN.

IWN is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while FUTY is Utilities Equities. IWN tracks Russell 2000 Value Index, while FUTY tracks MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for IWN and 0.08% for FUTY.

IWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWN and FUTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer