PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUTY vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUTY vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUTY achieves a 3.78% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, FUTY has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 9.09%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.


FUTY

1D
1.99%
1M
-5.15%
YTD
3.78%
6M
1.50%
1Y
10.45%
3Y*
13.84%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*
9.09%

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUTY vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUTY
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
3.78%16.40%23.20%-7.46%1.12%17.53%-0.80%24.89%4.36%12.52%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FUTY and VOO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013

0.40

The correlation between FUTY and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FUTY vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FUTY
VOO

Utilities

99.2%
2.4%

Energy

0.5%
3.5%

Industrials

0.2%
8.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Financial Services

-

11.6%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.7%

Utilities

FUTY
99.2%
VOO
2.4%

Energy

FUTY
0.5%
VOO
3.5%

Industrials

FUTY
0.2%
VOO
8.3%

Basic Materials

FUTY

-

VOO
1.8%

Communication Services

FUTY

-

VOO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FUTY

-

VOO
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

FUTY

-

VOO
4.9%

Financial Services

FUTY

-

VOO
11.6%

Healthcare

FUTY

-

VOO
8.5%

Real Estate

FUTY

-

VOO
1.9%

Technology

FUTY

-

VOO
35.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUTY vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUTY
FUTY Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FUTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUTY Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FUTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUTY vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FUTYVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.73

2.53

-1.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.07

3.43

-2.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.46

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

3.42

-2.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.73

15.95

-13.22

FUTY vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUTY and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FUTYVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

2.53

-1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.85

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.87

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.89

-0.34

Drawdowns

FUTY vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUTY drawdown since its inception was -36.44%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTY and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUTYVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.44%

-33.99%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-8.90%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.35%

-18.69%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.11%

-24.52%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.44%

-33.99%

-2.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.72%

0.00%

-6.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-3.69%

-2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.95%

1.91%

+2.04%

Volatility

FUTY vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that FUTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUTYVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.44%

2.74%

+2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.59%

8.88%

+2.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.32%

11.78%

+2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.08%

16.81%

+0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.05%

18.01%

+1.04%

FUTY vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUTY has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FUTY vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FUTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUTY
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
2.60%2.67%2.96%3.31%2.72%2.70%3.07%2.82%3.11%3.03%3.35%4.33%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FUTY and VOO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUTY has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUTY dropped -36.44% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.65% vs 9.09% for FUTY. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.65% return vs 9.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for FUTY.

FUTY has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.

FUTY is categorized as Utilities Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. FUTY tracks MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FUTY and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUTY and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer