IWMI vs. NVO

Last updated Jun 21, 2026

IWMI (NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos, while NVO (Novo Nordisk A/S) is a stock. Over the past year, IWMI returned 37.32% vs -38.72% for NVO. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

IWMI vs. NVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMI achieves a 16.41% return, which is significantly higher than NVO's -12.15% return.

IWMI

• 1D: 1.72%
• 1M: 3.75%
• YTD: 16.41%
• 6M: 14.83%
• 1Y: 37.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVO

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: -3.94%
• YTD: -12.15%
• 6M: -7.05%
• 1Y: -38.72%
• 3Y*: -16.67%
• 5Y*: 3.13%
• 10Y*: 7.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWMI vs. NVO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	16.41%	14.97%	6.58%
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S	-12.15%	-39.22%	-39.31%

Correlation

The correlation between IWMI and NVO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2024	0.33

Return for Risk

IWMI vs. NVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMI

IWMI Risk / Return Rank: 82
IWMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
IWMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
IWMI Omega Ratio Rank: 76
IWMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
IWMI Martin Ratio Rank: 88

NVO

NVO Risk / Return Rank: 13
NVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
NVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
NVO Omega Ratio Rank: 12
NVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
NVO Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWMI vs. NVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWMI	NVO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	-0.76	+3.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.33	-0.87	+4.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	0.87	+0.54
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.43	-0.77	+5.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.24	-1.20	+19.44

IWMI vs. NVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWMI Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the NVO Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWMI and NVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IWMI vs. NVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMI drawdown since its inception was -23.88%, smaller than the maximum NVO drawdown of -74.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMI and NVO.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWMI	NVO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.88%	-74.70%	+50.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.40%	-50.59%	+42.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-74.70%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-74.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-74.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-68.62%	+68.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.04%	-17.81%	+13.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	32.66%	-30.63%

Volatility

IWMI vs. NVO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) is 5.41%, while Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) has a volatility of 10.13%. This indicates that IWMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWMI	NVO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.41%	10.13%	-4.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.46%	37.86%	-26.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.38%	51.56%	-36.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.97%	38.34%	-20.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.97%	32.53%	-14.56%

Dividends

IWMI vs. NVO - Dividend Comparison

IWMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.51%, more than NVO's 4.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	14.51%	14.05%	8.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S	4.17%	3.31%	1.68%	1.00%	1.20%	1.35%	1.87%	2.14%	1.45%	1.52%	2.87%	0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWMI and NVO in my portfolio?

IWMI and NVO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IWMI or NVO?

NVO has higher volatility (10.13%) compared to IWMI (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWMI dropped -23.88% vs NVO's -74.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.