IWMI vs. NEHI

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

IWMI (NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF) and NEHI (NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWMI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos, while NEHI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWMI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for NEHI.

Performance

IWMI vs. NEHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF (NEHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMI achieves a 17.41% return, which is significantly higher than NEHI's -44.24% return.

IWMI

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 3.17%
• YTD: 17.41%
• 6M: 15.04%
• 1Y: 36.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NEHI

• 1D: -2.02%
• 1M: -23.78%
• YTD: -44.24%
• 6M: -43.35%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWMI vs. NEHI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	17.41%	1.28%
NEHI NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF	-44.24%	-1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between IWMI and NEHI is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025	0.52

Return for Risk

IWMI vs. NEHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMI

IWMI Risk / Return Rank: 86
IWMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
IWMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
IWMI Omega Ratio Rank: 81
IWMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
IWMI Martin Ratio Rank: 91

NEHI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWMI vs. NEHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF (NEHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWMI	NEHI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.40	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.15	—	—

Drawdowns

IWMI vs. NEHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMI drawdown since its inception was -23.88%, smaller than the maximum NEHI drawdown of -50.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMI and NEHI.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWMI	NEHI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.88%	-50.12%	+26.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-50.12%	+50.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.01%	-27.15%	+23.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IWMI	NEHI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.07%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.42%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.38%	59.50%	-44.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.92%	59.50%	-41.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.92%	59.50%	-41.58%

IWMI vs. NEHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWMI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than NEHI's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWMI vs. NEHI - Dividend Comparison

IWMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.34%, less than NEHI's 31.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	13.34%	14.05%	8.78%
NEHI NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF	31.69%	2.87%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWMI and NEHI in my portfolio?

IWMI and NEHI have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IWMI or NEHI?

On fees, IWMI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWMI or NEHI?

IWMI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for NEHI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWMI or NEHI?

NEHI has the higher dividend yield at 31.69%, compared with 13.34% for IWMI.

What is the main difference between IWMI and NEHI?

IWMI is categorized as Derivative Income, while NEHI is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for IWMI and 0.98% for NEHI.