IWMI vs. NEHI
IWMI (NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF) and NEHI (NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWMI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos, while NEHI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IWMI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for NEHI.
Performance
IWMI vs. NEHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWMI achieves a 14.60% return, which is significantly higher than NEHI's -36.78% return.
IWMI
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 14.60%
- 6M
- 13.67%
- 1Y
- 35.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NEHI
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- -23.11%
- YTD
- -36.78%
- 6M
- -38.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWMI vs. NEHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF | 14.60% | -0.11% |
NEHI NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF | -36.78% | -3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWMI and NEHI is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWMI vs. NEHI — Risk / Return Rank
IWMI
NEHI
IWMI vs. NEHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF (NEHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWMI | NEHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.29 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.85 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWMI | NEHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | -1.10 | +2.18 |
Drawdowns
IWMI vs. NEHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWMI drawdown since its inception was -23.88%, smaller than the maximum NEHI drawdown of -43.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMI and NEHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWMI | NEHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.88% | -43.46% | +19.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -43.46% | +43.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -25.23% | +21.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | — | — |
Volatility
IWMI vs. NEHI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWMI | NEHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.28% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.78% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.85% | 57.19% | -42.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.89% | 57.19% | -39.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.89% | 57.19% | -39.30% |
IWMI vs. NEHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWMI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than NEHI's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWMI vs. NEHI - Dividend Comparison
IWMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.38%, less than NEHI's 24.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF | 13.38% | 14.05% | 8.78% |
NEHI NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF | 24.72% | 2.87% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWMI and NEHI have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWMI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWMI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for NEHI.
NEHI has the higher dividend yield at 24.72%, compared with 13.38% for IWMI.
IWMI is categorized as Derivative Income, while NEHI is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for IWMI and 0.98% for NEHI.
Find the right allocation for IWMI and NEHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer