IWMI vs. HYBI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IWMI (NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF) and HYBI (NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWMI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos, while HYBI is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IWMI returned 35.89% vs 6.54% for HYBI. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.68% expense ratio.

Performance

IWMI vs. HYBI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMI achieves a 16.33% return, which is significantly higher than HYBI's 1.71% return.

IWMI

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 3.68%
• YTD: 16.33%
• 6M: 14.17%
• 1Y: 35.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HYBI

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 1.71%
• 6M: 1.90%
• 1Y: 6.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWMI vs. HYBI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	16.33%	14.97%	-0.30%
HYBI NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF	1.71%	6.97%	-0.53%

Correlation

The correlation between IWMI and HYBI is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2024	0.74

The correlation between IWMI and HYBI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IWMI vs. HYBI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMI

IWMI Risk / Return Rank: 79
IWMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
IWMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
IWMI Omega Ratio Rank: 72
IWMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
IWMI Martin Ratio Rank: 87

HYBI

HYBI Risk / Return Rank: 73
HYBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
HYBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
HYBI Omega Ratio Rank: 68
HYBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
HYBI Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWMI vs. HYBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWMI	HYBI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	1.96	+0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.23	2.99	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.38	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.29	4.60	-0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.68	14.75	+2.93

IWMI vs. HYBI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWMI Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the HYBI Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWMI and HYBI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IWMI vs. HYBI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMI drawdown since its inception was -23.88%, which is greater than HYBI's maximum drawdown of -4.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMI and HYBI.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWMI	HYBI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.88%	-4.68%	-19.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.40%	-1.43%	-6.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	-0.26%	-0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.03%	-0.61%	-3.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	0.44%	+1.60%

Volatility

IWMI vs. HYBI - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) at 1.28%. This indicates that IWMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWMI	HYBI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.22%	1.28%	+3.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.45%	2.35%	+9.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.41%	3.37%	+12.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.95%	4.94%	+13.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.95%	4.94%	+13.01%

IWMI vs. HYBI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IWMI and HYBI have an expense ratio of 0.68%.

Dividends

IWMI vs. HYBI - Dividend Comparison

IWMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.53%, more than HYBI's 9.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
HYBI NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF	9.09%	8.48%	2.21%
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	14.53%	14.05%	8.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWMI and HYBI in my portfolio?

IWMI and HYBI have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IWMI or HYBI?

IWMI has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to HYBI (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWMI dropped -23.88% vs HYBI's -4.68%.

Which ETF is better, IWMI or HYBI?

On 1-year performance, IWMI leads with 35.89% vs 6.54% for HYBI. Both ETFs have the same 0.68% expense ratio. On volatility, HYBI has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IWMI or HYBI?

Over the 1-year period, IWMI has performed better with a 35.89% return vs 6.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWMI or HYBI?

IWMI and HYBI have the same expense ratio: 0.68% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWMI or HYBI?

IWMI has the higher dividend yield at 14.53%, compared with 9.09% for HYBI.

What is the main difference between IWMI and HYBI?

IWMI is categorized as Derivative Income, while HYBI is Nontraditional Bonds.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.