IWLG vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IWLG (NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by NYLI, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. IWLG is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, IWLG returned 16.46% vs 4.60% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions. IWLG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

IWLG vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF (IWLG) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWLG achieves a 5.65% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.67% return.

IWLG

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 5.14%
• YTD: 5.65%
• 6M: 4.68%
• 1Y: 16.46%
• 3Y*: 23.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 2.67%
• 6M: 2.74%
• 1Y: 4.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWLG vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IWLG NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF	5.65%	14.93%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.67%	2.91%

Correlation

The correlation between IWLG and RBIL is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025	-0.25

Return for Risk

IWLG vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWLG

IWLG Risk / Return Rank: 25
IWLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
IWLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
IWLG Omega Ratio Rank: 27
IWLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
IWLG Martin Ratio Rank: 22

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 98
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWLG vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF (IWLG) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IWLG	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	5.06	-4.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.46	8.01	-6.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	2.41	-1.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.85	17.11	-16.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.59	71.11	-68.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWLG vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWLG Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 5.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWLG and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IWLG	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	5.06	-4.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.12	4.24	-3.13

Drawdowns

IWLG vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWLG drawdown since its inception was -23.19%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWLG and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWLG	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.19%	-0.50%	-22.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.45%	-0.27%	-19.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.34%	-0.03%	-1.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.57%	-0.06%	-4.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.38%	0.06%	+6.32%

Volatility

IWLG vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF (IWLG) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.30%. This indicates that IWLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWLG	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.47%	0.30%	+4.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.37%	0.79%	+11.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.31%	0.92%	+15.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.95%	1.05%	+19.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.95%	1.05%	+19.90%

IWLG vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWLG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWLG vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

IWLG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
IWLG NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.34%	0.01%	0.05%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.60%	3.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWLG and RBIL in my portfolio?

IWLG and RBIL have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IWLG or RBIL?

IWLG has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWLG dropped -23.19% vs RBIL's -0.50%.

Which ETF is better, IWLG or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, IWLG leads with 16.46% vs 4.60% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IWLG or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, IWLG has performed better with a 16.46% return vs 4.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWLG or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IWLG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWLG or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 0.00% for IWLG.

What is the main difference between IWLG and RBIL?

IWLG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: NYLI and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IWLG and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.06 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.