IWL vs. QARP

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

IWL (iShares Russell Top 200 ETF) and QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - IWL tracks the Russell Top 200 Index while QARP tracks the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IWL returned 13.70%/yr vs 12.09%/yr for QARP. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QARP.

Performance

IWL vs. QARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWL achieves a 9.41% return, which is significantly lower than QARP's 12.78% return.

IWL

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 0.21%
• 6M: 8.50%
• YTD: 9.41%
• 1Y: 21.21%
• 3Y*: 21.02%
• 5Y*: 13.70%
• 10Y*: 15.94%

QARP

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 1.10%
• 6M: 9.34%
• YTD: 12.78%
• 1Y: 25.00%
• 3Y*: 17.33%
• 5Y*: 12.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWL vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
IWL iShares Russell Top 200 ETF	9.41%	19.09%	27.12%	29.77%	-19.89%	27.79%	22.10%	31.42%	-2.62%
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF	12.78%	13.99%	18.94%	23.03%	-14.62%	31.82%	14.83%	30.70%	-5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between IWL and QARP is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018	0.91

The correlation between IWL and QARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWL vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWL	QARP
Technology	41.8%	23.5%
Communication Services	12.1%	11.3%
Financial Services	11.1%	12.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.7%	9.6%
Healthcare	8.5%	13.9%
Industrials	6.3%	8.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	9.6%
Energy	2.4%	5.8%
Basic Materials	1.4%	2.3%
Utilities	1.2%	2.0%
Real Estate	0.9%	1.0%

Return for Risk

IWL vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWL

IWL Risk / Return Rank: 60
IWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
IWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
IWL Omega Ratio Rank: 60
IWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
IWL Martin Ratio Rank: 64

QARP

QARP Risk / Return Rank: 87
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 88
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWL vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWL	QARP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	2.38	-0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	3.34	-1.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.43	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.17	3.46	-1.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.97	15.38	-6.41

IWL vs. QARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWL Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is lower than the QARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWL and QARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IWL vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWL drawdown since its inception was -32.71%, smaller than the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWL and QARP.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWL	QARP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.71%	-35.44%	+2.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.83%	-7.26%	-2.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.15%	-15.65%	-3.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.65%	-22.75%	-2.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.38%	0.00%	-1.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.87%	-4.39%	+0.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.37%	1.63%	+0.74%

Volatility

IWL vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.76%. This indicates that IWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWL	QARP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.63%	2.76%	+0.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.31%	8.22%	+2.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.97%	10.58%	+2.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.30%	15.54%	+1.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.09%	19.55%	-1.46%

IWL vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IWL vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison

IWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than QARP's 1.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWL iShares Russell Top 200 ETF	0.84%	0.90%	1.04%	1.30%	1.54%	1.12%	1.30%	1.96%	1.93%	1.69%	1.96%	2.14%
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF	1.02%	1.14%	1.39%	1.28%	1.68%	1.34%	1.61%	1.85%	1.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWL and QARP in my portfolio?

IWL and QARP have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IWL or QARP?

IWL has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to QARP (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWL dropped -32.71% vs QARP's -35.44%.

Which ETF is better, IWL or QARP?

On 5-year performance, IWL leads with 13.70% vs 12.09% for QARP. On fees, IWL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IWL or QARP?

Over the 5-year period, IWL has performed better with a 13.70% return vs 12.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWL or QARP?

IWL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for QARP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWL or QARP?

QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.84% for IWL.

What is the main difference between IWL and QARP?

IWL tracks Russell Top 200 Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IWL and 0.19% for QARP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.