IWL vs. GARY
IWL (iShares Russell Top 200 ETF) and GARY (Mango Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. IWL is passively managed, while GARY is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GARY.
Performance
IWL vs. GARY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWL achieves a 9.11% return, which is significantly lower than GARY's 30.03% return.
IWL
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- YTD
- 9.11%
- 1Y
- 21.24%
- 3Y*
- 21.09%
- 5Y*
- 13.40%
- 10Y*
- 15.94%
GARY
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- 6M
- 22.99%
- YTD
- 30.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWL vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IWL iShares Russell Top 200 ETF | 9.11% | 0.31% |
GARY Mango Growth ETF | 30.03% | 0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWL and GARY is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWL vs. GARY — Risk / Return Rank
IWL
GARY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IWL vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWL | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.00 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWL vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWL drawdown since its inception was -32.71%, which is greater than GARY's maximum drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWL and GARY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWL | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.71% | -10.28% | -22.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.65% | -5.23% | +3.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.88% | -1.87% | -2.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | — | — |
Volatility
IWL vs. GARY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWL | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.29% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.96% | 21.84% | -8.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 21.84% | -4.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 21.84% | -3.74% |
IWL vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWL vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison
IWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than GARY's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARY Mango Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWL iShares Russell Top 200 ETF | 0.85% | 0.90% | 1.04% | 1.30% | 1.54% | 1.12% | 1.30% | 1.96% | 1.93% | 1.69% | 1.96% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWL and GARY have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.
IWL has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.04% for GARY.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IWL and 0.77% for GARY.
Find the right allocation for IWL and GARY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer