IWFH vs. XLKI

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

IWFH (iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF) and XLKI (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. IWFH is passively managed, while XLKI is actively managed. IWFH charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLKI.

Performance

IWFH vs. XLKI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF (IWFH) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IWFH

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XLKI

• 1D: -1.19%
• 1M: -3.76%
• YTD: 12.02%
• 6M: 11.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWFH vs. XLKI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IWFH iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF	0.00%	0.00%
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	12.02%	10.02%

IWFH vs. XLKI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWFH	XLKI
Technology	43.2%	99.0%
Communication Services	31.6%	1.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	-
Healthcare	9.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	106.8%
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

IWFH vs. XLKI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF (IWFH) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IWFH	XLKI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-10.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-5.59%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-1.81%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IWFH	XLKI	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	18.44%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	18.44%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	18.44%	—

IWFH vs. XLKI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWFH has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKI's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWFH vs. XLKI - Dividend Comparison

IWFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLKI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.93%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
IWFH iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.05%	1.83%	0.31%	0.00%	0.18%
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	14.93%	8.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, IWFH or XLKI?

On fees, XLKI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWFH or XLKI?

XLKI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IWFH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWFH or XLKI?

XLKI has the higher dividend yield at 14.93%, compared with 0.00% for IWFH.

What is the main difference between IWFH and XLKI?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IWFH and 0.35% for XLKI.