IWFG vs. SGRT
IWFG (NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IWFG charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.
Performance
IWFG vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWFG achieves a -0.56% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 25.07% return.
IWFG
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- -0.56%
- 1Y
- 3.04%
- 3Y*
- 19.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 21.99%
SGRT
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -7.04%
- 6M
- 20.49%
- YTD
- 25.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.80K | $36.95K | $116.85K | |
| $998.46K | $1.36M | $2.23M |
IWFG vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IWFG NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF | -0.56% | 2.80% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth ETF | 25.07% | 26.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWFG and SGRT is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWFG vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank
IWFG
SGRT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IWFG vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (IWFG) and SMART Earnings Growth ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWFG | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.09 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWFG vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWFG drawdown since its inception was -21.97%, smaller than the maximum SGRT drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWFG and SGRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWFG | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.97% | -24.98% | +3.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.31% | -18.61% | +13.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -4.25% | +0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.20% | — | — |
Volatility
IWFG vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWFG | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.48% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.71% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.48% | 38.93% | -20.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.61% | 38.93% | -18.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.61% | 38.93% | -18.32% |
IWFG vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWFG has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWFG vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison
IWFG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWFG NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.44% | 1.01% | 0.05% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth ETF | 0.13% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWFG and SGRT have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWFG is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWFG is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.
SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for IWFG.
Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IWFG and 0.59% for SGRT.
Find the right allocation for IWFG and SGRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer