PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWD vs. USL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWD vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWD achieves a 14.20% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 63.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWD having a 11.23% annualized return and USL not far behind at 10.91%.


IWD

1D
-0.01%
1M
4.22%
YTD
14.20%
6M
14.76%
1Y
28.16%
3Y*
18.40%
5Y*
10.17%
10Y*
11.23%

USL

1D
1.55%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
63.07%
6M
59.66%
1Y
57.86%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
17.41%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWD vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
14.20%15.68%14.17%11.34%-7.75%24.95%2.73%26.12%-8.45%13.45%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
63.07%-12.37%8.30%-1.11%27.10%62.48%-25.23%28.01%-14.15%2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between IWD and USL is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2007

0.34

The correlation between IWD and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IWD vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWD
USL

Financial Services

18.5%
4.5%

Technology

17.9%

-

Industrials

12.7%

-

Healthcare

10.5%

-

Communication Services

8.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.7%

-

Energy

6.5%

-

Utilities

4.1%

-

Real Estate

3.9%

-

Basic Materials

3.7%

-

Financial Services

IWD
18.5%
USL
4.5%

Technology

IWD
17.9%
USL

-

Industrials

IWD
12.7%
USL

-

Healthcare

IWD
10.5%
USL

-

Communication Services

IWD
8.2%
USL

-

Consumer Cyclical

IWD
7.0%
USL

-

Consumer Defensive

IWD
6.7%
USL

-

Energy

IWD
6.5%
USL

-

Utilities

IWD
4.1%
USL

-

Real Estate

IWD
3.9%
USL

-

Basic Materials

IWD
3.7%
USL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWD vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWD
IWD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
IWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWD Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
IWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWD Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWD vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWDUSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.34

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.17

3.47

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.46

7.02

+10.44

IWD vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWD Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the USL Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWD and USL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWDUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

2.04

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.58

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.34

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.01

+0.42

Drawdowns

IWD vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWD drawdown since its inception was -60.10%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWD and USL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWDUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.10%

-89.06%

+28.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.79%

-16.76%

+9.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.71%

-23.33%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

-33.82%

+14.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.51%

-66.02%

+27.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-38.16%

+38.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.65%

-61.46%

+52.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

8.27%

-6.65%

Volatility

IWD vs. USL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) is 2.90%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that IWD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWDUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

10.53%

-7.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.06%

23.33%

-15.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.77%

28.54%

-17.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.81%

30.08%

-15.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.29%

32.35%

-15.06%

IWD vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWD has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWD vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

IWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
1.50%1.69%1.87%2.02%2.15%1.62%2.05%2.45%2.71%2.09%2.25%2.47%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWD and USL have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USL has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to IWD (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWD dropped -60.10% vs USL's -89.06%.

On 10-year performance, IWD leads with 11.23% vs 10.91% for USL. On fees, IWD is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IWD has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWD has performed better with a 11.23% return vs 10.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWD is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

IWD has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

IWD is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. IWD tracks Russell 1000 Value Index, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IWD and 0.88% for USL.

IWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWD and USL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer