PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWD vs. SPYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWD vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWD achieves a 20.56% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 10.14% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWD having a 11.56% annualized return and SPYV not far ahead at 11.92%.


IWD

1D
0.44%
1M
2.03%
6M
15.34%
YTD
20.56%
1Y
32.78%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
11.62%
10Y*
11.56%
ALL TIME*
8.29%

SPYV

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.68%
6M
7.56%
YTD
10.14%
1Y
21.27%
3Y*
13.90%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
11.92%
ALL TIME*
7.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$542.34M$454.50M$526.80M
$129.05M$117.43M$146.49M

IWD vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
20.56%15.68%14.17%11.34%-7.75%24.95%2.73%26.12%-8.45%13.45%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
10.14%13.18%12.24%22.20%-5.28%24.91%1.38%31.70%-9.01%15.40%

Correlation

The correlation between IWD and SPYV is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2000

0.90

The correlation between IWD and SPYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWD vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWD
SPYV

Technology

19.7%
21.7%

Financial Services

19.3%
15.1%

Healthcare

12.6%
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
10.6%

Industrials

10.2%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
8.8%

Energy

5.9%
6.6%

Utilities

3.8%
4.5%

Real Estate

3.8%
3.3%

Basic Materials

3.5%
3.3%

Communication Services

3.2%
2.9%

Technology

IWD
19.7%
SPYV
21.7%

Financial Services

IWD
19.3%
SPYV
15.1%

Healthcare

IWD
12.6%
SPYV
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

IWD
10.3%
SPYV
10.6%

Industrials

IWD
10.2%
SPYV
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

IWD
7.4%
SPYV
8.8%

Energy

IWD
5.9%
SPYV
6.6%

Utilities

IWD
3.8%
SPYV
4.5%

Real Estate

IWD
3.8%
SPYV
3.3%

Basic Materials

IWD
3.5%
SPYV
3.3%

Communication Services

IWD
3.2%
SPYV
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWD vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IWD
IWD Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
IWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
IWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWD Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYV
SPYV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SPYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IWD vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWDSPYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.36

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.58

3.17

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.60

12.28

+7.32

IWD vs. SPYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWD Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the SPYV Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWD and SPYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWD vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWD drawdown since its inception was -60.10%, roughly equal to the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWD and SPYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWDSPYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.10%

-58.45%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.79%

-6.22%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.71%

-17.54%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

-17.89%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.51%

-36.89%

-1.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-1.13%

+1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.60%

-8.67%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.61%

-0.02%

Volatility

IWD vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) has a higher volatility of 2.86% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 2.72%. This indicates that IWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWDSPYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

2.72%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.65%

7.14%

+1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.35%

9.99%

+1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.81%

14.30%

+0.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.25%

16.88%

+0.37%

IWD vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWD has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWD vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison

IWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than SPYV's 1.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
1.39%1.69%1.87%2.02%2.15%1.62%2.05%2.45%2.71%2.09%2.25%2.47%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
1.69%1.77%2.29%1.75%2.22%2.10%2.38%2.25%2.97%2.77%2.39%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, IWD and SPYV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IWD has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to SPYV (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWD dropped -60.10% vs SPYV's -58.45%.

On 10-year performance, SPYV leads with 11.92% vs 11.56% for IWD. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 11.92% return vs 11.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IWD.

SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 1.39% for IWD.

IWD is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPYV is S&P 500. IWD tracks Russell 1000 Value Index, while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IWD and 0.04% for SPYV.

IWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWD and SPYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer