IWB vs. PSCX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IWB (iShares Russell 1000 ETF) and PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. IWB is passively managed, while PSCX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IWB returned 12.99%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for PSCX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWB charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSCX.

Performance

IWB vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWB achieves a 10.54% return, which is significantly higher than PSCX's 5.11% return.

IWB

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 4.95%
• YTD: 10.54%
• 6M: 10.51%
• 1Y: 27.03%
• 3Y*: 22.02%
• 5Y*: 12.99%
• 10Y*: 15.17%

PSCX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.00%
• YTD: 5.11%
• 6M: 5.98%
• 1Y: 15.49%
• 3Y*: 12.85%
• 5Y*: 8.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWB vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF	10.54%	17.18%	24.32%	26.39%	-19.19%	26.32%	1.33%
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	5.11%	12.08%	13.27%	16.57%	-7.35%	9.03%	0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between IWB and PSCX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2020	0.90

The correlation between IWB and PSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWB vs. PSCX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWB	PSCX
Technology	36.6%	33.2%
Financial Services	11.3%	12.5%
Communication Services	10.4%	10.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	10.0%
Industrials	8.6%	8.4%
Healthcare	8.6%	9.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	5.4%
Energy	3.3%	4.2%
Utilities	2.5%	2.6%
Real Estate	2.1%	2.0%
Basic Materials	1.9%	1.9%

Return for Risk

IWB vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWB

IWB Risk / Return Rank: 67
IWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
IWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
IWB Omega Ratio Rank: 66
IWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
IWB Martin Ratio Rank: 73

PSCX

PSCX Risk / Return Rank: 85
PSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
PSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
PSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
PSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWB vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IWB	PSCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	2.82	-0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	4.22	-1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.58	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	3.70	-0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.09	18.94	-4.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWB vs. PSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWB Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the PSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWB and PSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IWB	PSCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28	2.82	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	1.20	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	1.27	-0.82

Drawdowns

IWB vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWB drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, which is greater than PSCX's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWB and PSCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWB	PSCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.38%	-10.20%	-45.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.86%	-4.20%	-4.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.09%	-9.61%	-9.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.20%	-10.20%	-15.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.71%	-0.12%	-0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.86%	-1.87%	-8.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	0.82%	+1.10%

Volatility

IWB vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) has a higher volatility of 2.88% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) at 0.89%. This indicates that IWB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWB	PSCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.88%	0.89%	+1.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.97%	4.21%	+4.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.93%	5.53%	+6.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.10%	7.07%	+10.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.14%	6.96%	+11.18%

IWB vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWB vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison

IWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF	0.91%	1.00%	1.14%	1.31%	1.56%	1.09%	1.37%	1.71%	2.06%	1.64%	1.89%	1.95%
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWB and PSCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, IWB and PSCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, IWB or PSCX?

IWB has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to PSCX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWB dropped -55.38% vs PSCX's -10.20%.

Which ETF is better, IWB or PSCX?

On 5-year performance, IWB leads with 12.99% vs 8.46% for PSCX. On fees, IWB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PSCX has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IWB or PSCX?

Over the 5-year period, IWB has performed better with a 12.99% return vs 8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWB or PSCX?

IWB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWB or PSCX?

IWB has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.

What is the main difference between IWB and PSCX?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IWB and 0.75% for PSCX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.