PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IWB vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IWB vs. VTI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IWB (iShares Russell 1000 ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - IWB tracks the Russell 1000 Index while VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWB returned 15.17%/yr vs 15.05%/yr for VTI. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IWB charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.

Performance

IWB vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWB achieves a 10.54% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWB having a 15.17% annualized return and VTI not far behind at 15.05%.

IWB

1D
-0.71%
1M
4.95%
YTD
10.54%
6M
10.51%
1Y
27.03%
3Y*
22.02%
5Y*
12.99%
10Y*
15.17%

VTI

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.99%
YTD
11.20%
6M
11.09%
1Y
28.18%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWB vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF		10.54%17.18%24.32%26.39%-19.19%26.32%20.77%31.06%-4.90%21.52%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF		11.20%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between IWB and VTI is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2001

0.99

The correlation between IWB and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWB vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IWB
VTI

Technology

36.6%
33.5%

Financial Services

11.3%
12.0%

Communication Services

10.4%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
10.0%

Industrials

8.6%
9.8%

Healthcare

8.6%
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
4.7%

Energy

3.3%
3.7%

Utilities

2.5%
2.3%

Real Estate

2.1%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.9%
2.0%

Technology

IWB
36.6%
VTI
33.5%

Financial Services

IWB
11.3%
VTI
12.0%

Communication Services

IWB
10.4%
VTI
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IWB
10.0%
VTI
10.0%

Industrials

IWB
8.6%
VTI
9.8%

Healthcare

IWB
8.6%
VTI
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

IWB
4.5%
VTI
4.7%

Energy

IWB
3.3%
VTI
3.7%

Utilities

IWB
2.5%
VTI
2.3%

Real Estate

IWB
2.1%
VTI
2.4%

Basic Materials

IWB
1.9%
VTI
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Russell 1000 ETF

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF

Often compared with IWB:
IWB vs. IWMIWB vs. SPYIWB vs. VONEIWB vs. IWDIWB vs. VOOIWB vs. IWVIWB vs. EQAL
Often compared with VTI:
VTI vs. VOOVTI vs. VXUSVTI vs. SPYVTI vs. VTVTI vs. SCHDVTI vs. FZROXVTI vs. QQQ

Return for Risk

IWB vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IWB
IWB Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWB Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
IWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWB Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWB vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IWBVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.28
2.33

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.12
3.18

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.42

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

3.17

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.09

14.62

-0.53

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWB vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWB Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWB and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IWBVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.33

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.73

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.82

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.51

-0.06

Drawdowns

IWB vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWB drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, roughly equal to the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWB and VTI.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IWBVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.38%

-55.45%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.86%

-8.92%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.09%

-19.30%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.20%

-25.36%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.60%

-35.00%

+0.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-0.72%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.86%

-8.03%

-2.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.93%

-0.01%

Volatility

IWB vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) have volatilities of 2.88% and 2.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IWBVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

2.96%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.97%

9.13%

-0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.93%

12.17%

-0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.10%

17.40%

-0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.14%

18.30%

-0.16%

IWB vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IWB vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

IWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than VTI's 1.01% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF		0.91%1.00%1.14%1.31%1.56%1.09%1.37%1.71%2.06%1.64%1.89%1.95%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF		1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 1.00, IWB and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTI has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to IWB (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWB dropped -55.38% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 10-year performance, IWB leads with 15.17% vs 15.05% for VTI. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWB has performed better with a 15.17% return vs 15.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IWB.

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.91% for IWB.

IWB tracks Russell 1000 Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IWB and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWB and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer