PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWB vs. VONE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWB vs. VONE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IWB having a 11.33% return and VONE slightly higher at 11.34%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWB having a 15.25% annualized return and VONE not far ahead at 15.33%.


IWB

1D
0.21%
1M
5.30%
YTD
11.33%
6M
11.69%
1Y
28.84%
3Y*
22.31%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*
15.25%

VONE

1D
0.22%
1M
5.34%
YTD
11.34%
6M
11.71%
1Y
28.72%
3Y*
22.40%
5Y*
13.44%
10Y*
15.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWB vs. VONE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
11.33%17.18%24.32%26.39%-19.19%26.32%20.77%31.06%-4.90%21.52%
VONE
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF
11.34%17.21%24.51%26.41%-19.14%26.49%20.95%31.12%-4.84%21.55%

Correlation

The correlation between IWB and VONE is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.98

The correlation between IWB and VONE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWB vs. VONE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWB
VONE

Technology

36.6%
33.9%

Financial Services

11.3%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.4%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
10.3%

Industrials

8.6%
9.2%

Healthcare

8.6%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
4.8%

Energy

3.3%
3.7%

Utilities

2.5%
2.3%

Real Estate

2.1%
2.2%

Basic Materials

1.9%
2.0%

Technology

IWB
36.6%
VONE
33.9%

Financial Services

IWB
11.3%
VONE
11.9%

Communication Services

IWB
10.4%
VONE
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IWB
10.0%
VONE
10.3%

Industrials

IWB
8.6%
VONE
9.2%

Healthcare

IWB
8.6%
VONE
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

IWB
4.5%
VONE
4.8%

Energy

IWB
3.3%
VONE
3.7%

Utilities

IWB
2.5%
VONE
2.3%

Real Estate

IWB
2.1%
VONE
2.2%

Basic Materials

IWB
1.9%
VONE
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWB vs. VONE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWB
IWB Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWB Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWB Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

VONE
VONE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VONE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VONE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWB vs. VONE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWBVONEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.43

2.41

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.31

3.31

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.43

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

3.33

-0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.26

15.39

-0.13

IWB vs. VONE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWB Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the VONE Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWB and VONE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWBVONEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

2.41

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.79

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.84

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.86

-0.40

Drawdowns

IWB vs. VONE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWB drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, which is greater than VONE's maximum drawdown of -34.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWB and VONE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWBVONEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.38%

-34.66%

-20.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.86%

-8.85%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.09%

-19.06%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.20%

-25.12%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.60%

-34.66%

+0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.86%

-3.91%

-6.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.92%

0.00%

Volatility

IWB vs. VONE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) have volatilities of 2.78% and 2.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWBVONEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

2.71%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.95%

8.98%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.91%

11.96%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.10%

17.08%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.14%

18.25%

-0.11%

IWB vs. VONE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VONE's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWB vs. VONE - Dividend Comparison

IWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than VONE's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
0.91%1.00%1.14%1.31%1.56%1.09%1.37%1.71%2.06%1.64%1.89%1.95%
VONE
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF
0.98%1.07%1.20%1.40%1.59%1.16%1.45%1.65%1.96%1.69%1.89%1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, IWB and VONE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IWB has higher volatility (2.78%) compared to VONE (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWB dropped -55.38% vs VONE's -34.66%.

On 10-year performance, VONE leads with 15.33% vs 15.25% for IWB. On fees, VONE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONE has performed better with a 15.33% return vs 15.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IWB.

VONE has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.91% for IWB.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IWB and 0.08% for VONE.

IWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWB and VONE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer