PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IWB vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IWB vs. BBUS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IWB (iShares Russell 1000 ETF) and BBUS (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - IWB tracks the Russell 1000 Index while BBUS tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IWB returned 12.20%/yr vs 12.52%/yr for BBUS. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IWB charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.

Performance

IWB vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWB achieves a 8.01% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 7.57% return.

IWB

1D
-1.32%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
8.01%
6M
7.03%
1Y
22.97%
3Y*
20.50%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
15.25%

BBUS

1D
-1.68%
1M
-1.53%
YTD
7.57%
6M
6.62%
1Y
22.78%
3Y*
20.70%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWB vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF		8.01%17.18%24.32%26.39%-19.19%26.32%20.77%16.86%
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF		7.57%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between IWB and BBUS is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019

0.99

The correlation between IWB and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWB vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IWB
BBUS

Technology

37.3%
38.1%

Financial Services

11.3%
11.2%

Communication Services

10.4%
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
9.1%

Industrials

8.7%
7.4%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
4.4%

Energy

3.2%
3.0%

Real Estate

2.1%
1.7%

Utilities

2.1%
2.6%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.2%

Technology

IWB
37.3%
BBUS
38.1%

Financial Services

IWB
11.3%
BBUS
11.2%

Communication Services

IWB
10.4%
BBUS
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IWB
10.0%
BBUS
9.1%

Industrials

IWB
8.7%
BBUS
7.4%

Healthcare

IWB
8.5%
BBUS
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

IWB
4.4%
BBUS
4.4%

Energy

IWB
3.2%
BBUS
3.0%

Real Estate

IWB
2.1%
BBUS
1.7%

Utilities

IWB
2.1%
BBUS
2.6%

Basic Materials

IWB
1.9%
BBUS
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Russell 1000 ETF

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF

Often compared with IWB:
IWB vs. IWMIWB vs. SPYIWB vs. VONEIWB vs. IWDIWB vs. VOOIWB vs. IWVIWB vs. VTI
Often compared with BBUS:
BBUS vs. VOOBBUS vs. VTIBBUS vs. BBREBBUS vs. SPTMBBUS vs. QQQBBUS vs. BBCABBUS vs. SCHK

Return for Risk

IWB vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IWB
IWB Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
IWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWB Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWB Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWB vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IWBBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.84
1.82

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.51
2.48

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.33

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

2.49

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.56

10.97

+0.58

IWB vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWB Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWB and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWB vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWB drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, which is greater than BBUS's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWB and BBUS.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IWBBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.38%

-35.35%

-20.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.86%

-9.21%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.09%

-19.01%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.20%

-25.46%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.60%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.98%

-3.47%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.84%

-5.43%

-5.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.08%

-0.09%

Volatility

IWB vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) have volatilities of 4.84% and 5.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IWBBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

5.00%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.88%

9.95%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.57%

12.59%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.20%

17.14%

+0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.15%

19.59%

-1.44%

IWB vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IWB vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

IWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than BBUS's 1.01% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF		1.01%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF		0.94%1.00%1.14%1.31%1.56%1.09%1.37%1.71%2.06%1.64%1.89%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 1.00, IWB and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BBUS has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to IWB (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWB dropped -55.38% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 12.52% vs 12.20% for IWB. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, IWB has been the lower-risk option at 4.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 12.52% return vs 12.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IWB.

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.94% for IWB.

IWB tracks Russell 1000 Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IWB and 0.02% for BBUS.

IWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWB and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer