IVW vs. VOOV
IVW (iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF) and VOOV (Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500/Citigroup Growth Index, while VOOV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVW returned 18.07%/yr vs 11.82%/yr for VOOV. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVW charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VOOV.
Performance
IVW vs. VOOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVW achieves a 13.68% return, which is significantly higher than VOOV's 7.51% return. Over the past 10 years, IVW has outperformed VOOV with an annualized return of 18.07%, while VOOV has yielded a comparatively lower 11.82% annualized return.
IVW
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 7.39%
- YTD
- 13.68%
- 6M
- 13.49%
- 1Y
- 33.77%
- 3Y*
- 27.99%
- 5Y*
- 15.93%
- 10Y*
- 18.07%
VOOV
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 7.51%
- 6M
- 7.76%
- 1Y
- 21.33%
- 3Y*
- 15.68%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.82%
IVW vs. VOOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVW iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | 13.68% | 21.95% | 35.82% | 29.83% | -29.50% | 31.80% | 33.19% | 30.77% | -0.21% | 27.21% |
VOOV Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF | 7.51% | 13.10% | 12.21% | 22.15% | -5.37% | 24.87% | 1.23% | 31.75% | -9.09% | 15.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVW and VOOV is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IVW and VOOV has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IVW vs. VOOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVW
VOOV
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
IVW
VOOV
Communication Services
IVW
VOOV
Consumer Cyclical
IVW
VOOV
Financial Services
IVW
VOOV
Industrials
IVW
VOOV
Healthcare
IVW
VOOV
Consumer Defensive
IVW
VOOV
Real Estate
IVW
VOOV
Utilities
IVW
VOOV
Basic Materials
IVW
VOOV
Energy
IVW
VOOV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVW vs. VOOV — Risk / Return Rank
IVW
VOOV
IVW vs. VOOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVW | VOOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.14 | 2.18 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.88 | 3.04 | -0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.39 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 3.42 | -0.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.19 | 13.04 | -2.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVW | VOOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 2.18 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.74 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.70 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.75 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
IVW vs. VOOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVW drawdown since its inception was -57.33%, which is greater than VOOV's maximum drawdown of -37.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVW and VOOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVW | VOOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.33% | -37.31% | -20.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.75% | -6.27% | -7.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.15% | -17.55% | -4.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.72% | -18.10% | -14.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.72% | -37.31% | +4.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -0.52% | -0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.62% | -3.84% | -13.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 1.64% | +1.68% |
Volatility
IVW vs. VOOV - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) at 2.01%. This indicates that IVW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVW | VOOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.30% | 2.01% | +2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.37% | 7.06% | +5.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.87% | 9.83% | +6.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.16% | 14.45% | +6.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 16.95% | +3.67% |
IVW vs. VOOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVW has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOV's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IVW vs. VOOV - Dividend Comparison
IVW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than VOOV's 1.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVW iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.35% | 0.40% | 0.43% | 1.03% | 0.92% | 0.46% | 0.82% | 1.63% | 1.28% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.51% |
VOOV Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.68% | 1.76% | 2.10% | 1.69% | 2.19% | 1.87% | 2.45% | 2.10% | 2.65% | 2.13% | 2.24% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVW and VOOV have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVW has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to VOOV (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVW dropped -57.33% vs VOOV's -37.31%.
On 10-year performance, IVW leads with 18.07% vs 11.82% for VOOV. On fees, VOOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VOOV has been the lower-risk option at 2.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVW has performed better with a 18.07% return vs 11.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IVW.
VOOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.35% for IVW.
IVW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VOOV is Large Cap Value Equities. IVW tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Growth Index, while VOOV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IVW and 0.10% for VOOV.
VOOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVW and VOOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer