PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVW vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVW vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVW achieves a 10.91% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 20.66% return. Over the past 10 years, IVW has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 17.45%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.34% annualized return.


IVW

1D
-1.54%
1M
1.18%
6M
9.29%
YTD
10.91%
1Y
23.77%
3Y*
24.88%
5Y*
13.45%
10Y*
17.45%

SCHD

1D
0.49%
1M
-0.00%
6M
16.13%
YTD
20.66%
1Y
23.51%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVW vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
10.91%21.95%35.82%29.83%-29.50%31.80%33.19%30.77%-0.21%27.21%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
20.66%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between IVW and SCHD is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between IVW and SCHD has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IVW vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVW
SCHD

Technology

52.0%
19.4%

Communication Services

15.8%
6.0%

Financial Services

8.9%
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
6.7%

Healthcare

6.2%
18.4%

Industrials

5.4%
7.4%

Utilities

1.2%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
18.5%

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Basic Materials

0.3%
1.2%

Energy

0.1%
14.6%

Technology

IVW
52.0%
SCHD
19.4%

Communication Services

IVW
15.8%
SCHD
6.0%

Financial Services

IVW
8.9%
SCHD
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IVW
8.5%
SCHD
6.7%

Healthcare

IVW
6.2%
SCHD
18.4%

Industrials

IVW
5.4%
SCHD
7.4%

Utilities

IVW
1.2%
SCHD
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

IVW
1.0%
SCHD
18.5%

Real Estate

IVW
0.6%
SCHD

-

Basic Materials

IVW
0.3%
SCHD
1.2%

Energy

IVW
0.1%
SCHD
14.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVW vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVW
IVW Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
IVW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVW Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
IVW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVW Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVW vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVWSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.38

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

5.12

-3.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.65

12.47

-5.81

IVW vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVW Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVW and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVW vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVW drawdown since its inception was -57.33%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVW and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVWSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.33%

-33.37%

-23.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.75%

-4.61%

-9.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.15%

-16.13%

-6.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.72%

-16.85%

-15.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.72%

-33.37%

+0.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.53%

-0.03%

-3.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.56%

-3.31%

-14.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

1.89%

+1.69%

Volatility

IVW vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) has a higher volatility of 6.39% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.54%. This indicates that IVW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVWSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.39%

3.54%

+2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.19%

7.70%

+6.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.29%

10.93%

+6.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.40%

14.36%

+7.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.70%

16.70%

+4.00%

IVW vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVW has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IVW vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

IVW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than SCHD's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.36%0.40%0.43%1.03%0.92%0.46%0.82%1.63%1.28%1.30%1.51%1.51%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.22%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVW and SCHD have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVW has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to SCHD (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVW dropped -57.33% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, IVW leads with 17.45% vs 12.34% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVW has performed better with a 17.45% return vs 12.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IVW.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 0.36% for IVW.

IVW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. IVW tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IVW and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVW and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer