IVW vs. SCHD
IVW (iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVW returned 18.07%/yr vs 12.77%/yr for SCHD. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVW charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
IVW vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVW achieves a 13.68% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return. Over the past 10 years, IVW has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 18.07%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.77% annualized return.
IVW
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 7.39%
- YTD
- 13.68%
- 6M
- 13.49%
- 1Y
- 33.77%
- 3Y*
- 27.99%
- 5Y*
- 15.93%
- 10Y*
- 18.07%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 19.01%
- 6M
- 18.63%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
IVW vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVW iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | 13.68% | 21.95% | 35.82% | 29.83% | -29.50% | 31.80% | 33.19% | 30.77% | -0.21% | 27.21% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.01% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVW and SCHD is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IVW and SCHD has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IVW vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVW
SCHD
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
IVW
SCHD
Communication Services
IVW
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
IVW
SCHD
Financial Services
IVW
SCHD
Industrials
IVW
SCHD
Healthcare
IVW
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
IVW
SCHD
Real Estate
IVW
SCHD
-
Utilities
IVW
SCHD
Basic Materials
IVW
SCHD
Energy
IVW
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVW vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
IVW
SCHD
IVW vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVW | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.45 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 5.91 | -3.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.19 | 14.53 | -4.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVW | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 2.49 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.58 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.77 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.86 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
IVW vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVW drawdown since its inception was -57.33%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVW and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVW | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.33% | -33.37% | -23.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.75% | -4.61% | -9.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.15% | -16.13% | -6.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.72% | -16.85% | -15.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.72% | -33.37% | +0.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -1.40% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.62% | -3.32% | -14.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 1.88% | +1.44% |
Volatility
IVW vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.66%. This indicates that IVW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVW | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.30% | 2.66% | +1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.37% | 7.66% | +4.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.87% | 10.96% | +4.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.16% | 14.38% | +6.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 16.72% | +3.90% |
IVW vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVW has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IVW vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
IVW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVW iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.35% | 0.40% | 0.43% | 1.03% | 0.92% | 0.46% | 0.82% | 1.63% | 1.28% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.51% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVW and SCHD have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVW has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to SCHD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVW dropped -57.33% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, IVW leads with 18.07% vs 12.77% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVW has performed better with a 18.07% return vs 12.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IVW.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 0.35% for IVW.
IVW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. IVW tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IVW and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVW and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer