IVV vs. VO
IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) and VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while VO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVV returned 15.32%/yr vs 11.44%/yr for VO. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.03% expense ratio.
Performance
IVV vs. VO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IVV having a 8.72% return and VO slightly lower at 8.60%. Over the past 10 years, IVV has outperformed VO with an annualized return of 15.32%, while VO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.44% annualized return.
IVV
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 8.76%
- 1Y
- 24.89%
- 3Y*
- 21.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 15.32%
VO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 8.60%
- 6M
- 8.43%
- 1Y
- 16.32%
- 3Y*
- 15.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.44%
IVV vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 8.72% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 8.60% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVV and VO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004 | 0.92 |
The correlation between IVV and VO shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IVV vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVV
VO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
IVV
VO
Financial Services
IVV
VO
Communication Services
IVV
VO
Consumer Cyclical
IVV
VO
Healthcare
IVV
VO
Industrials
IVV
VO
Consumer Defensive
IVV
VO
Energy
IVV
VO
Utilities
IVV
VO
Real Estate
IVV
VO
Basic Materials
IVV
VO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVV vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank
IVV
VO
IVV vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVV | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.23 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 2.01 | +0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.97 | 7.62 | +5.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVV | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 1.31 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.43 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 0.61 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.50 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
IVV vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and VO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVV | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.25% | -58.87% | +3.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -8.17% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.75% | -19.02% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.53% | -27.57% | +3.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.90% | -39.37% | +5.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.67% | -2.10% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.77% | -7.86% | -2.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 2.15% | -0.23% |
Volatility
IVV vs. VO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a higher volatility of 3.77% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 3.51%. This indicates that IVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVV | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 3.51% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.31% | 9.46% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.08% | 12.51% | -0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 17.62% | -0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 18.96% | -0.89% |
IVV vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IVV and VO have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IVV vs. VO - Dividend Comparison
IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than VO's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.09% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.38% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVV and VO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVV has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to VO (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVV dropped -55.25% vs VO's -58.87%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.32% vs 11.44% for VO. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.32% return vs 11.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV and VO have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.
VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 1.09% for IVV.
IVV is categorized as S&P 500, while VO is Mid Cap Blend Equities. IVV tracks S&P 500 Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVV and VO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer