IVV vs. GLTR
IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) and GLTR (abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while GLTR is a Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVV returned 15.47%/yr vs 12.08%/yr for GLTR. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IVV charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GLTR.
Performance
IVV vs. GLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVV achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly higher than GLTR's -4.66% return. Over the past 10 years, IVV has outperformed GLTR with an annualized return of 15.47%, while GLTR has yielded a comparatively lower 12.08% annualized return.
IVV
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 9.43%
- 1Y
- 25.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.42%
- 10Y*
- 15.47%
GLTR
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -9.08%
- YTD
- -4.66%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 38.86%
- 3Y*
- 29.97%
- 5Y*
- 14.04%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
IVV vs. GLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 9.08% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | -4.66% | 87.25% | 20.63% | 2.01% | -0.25% | -9.60% | 29.52% | 20.96% | -2.85% | 12.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVV and GLTR is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2010 | 0.16 |
The correlation between IVV and GLTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVV vs. GLTR — Risk / Return Rank
IVV
GLTR
IVV vs. GLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVV | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.22 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 1.17 | +1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.43 | 2.88 | +9.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVV vs. GLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, roughly equal to the maximum GLTR drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and GLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVV | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.25% | -55.70% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -34.09% | +25.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.75% | -34.09% | +15.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.53% | -34.09% | +9.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.90% | -34.09% | +0.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | -31.27% | +28.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.77% | -28.82% | +18.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 13.86% | -11.89% |
Volatility
IVV vs. GLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is 4.37%, while abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that IVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVV | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 10.43% | -6.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.59% | 36.24% | -26.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 38.40% | -26.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 23.87% | -6.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 20.64% | -2.56% |
IVV vs. GLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than GLTR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVV vs. GLTR - Dividend Comparison
IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.08% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVV and GLTR have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLTR has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to IVV (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVV dropped -55.25% vs GLTR's -55.70%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.47% vs 12.08% for GLTR. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.47% return vs 12.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GLTR.
IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.00% for GLTR.
IVV is categorized as S&P 500, while GLTR is Precious Metals. IVV tracks S&P 500 Index, while GLTR tracks ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for IVV and 0.60% for GLTR.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVV and GLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer