IVRS vs. XT
IVRS (iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF) and XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from iShares - IVRS tracks the Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net while XT tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IVRS returned 7.73%/yr vs 16.27%/yr for XT. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IVRS charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for XT.
Performance
IVRS vs. XT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVRS achieves a -7.07% return, which is significantly lower than XT's 15.68% return.
IVRS
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- 6M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- -7.07%
- 1Y
- -11.56%
- 3Y*
- 7.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.16%
XT
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- 6M
- 11.05%
- YTD
- 15.68%
- 1Y
- 33.19%
- 3Y*
- 16.27%
- 5Y*
- 6.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $45.64K | $34.99K | $21.63K | |
| $6.36M | $6.26M | $10.28M |
IVRS vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | -7.07% | 12.75% | 7.40% | 28.15% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 15.68% | 26.28% | 0.29% | 10.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVRS and XT is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2023 | 0.82 |
The correlation between IVRS and XT shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IVRS vs. XT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVRS
XT
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
IVRS
XT
Technology
IVRS
XT
Financial Services
IVRS
XT
Consumer Cyclical
IVRS
XT
Basic Materials
IVRS
-
XT
Consumer Defensive
IVRS
-
XT
Energy
IVRS
-
XT
Healthcare
IVRS
-
XT
Industrials
IVRS
-
XT
Real Estate
IVRS
-
XT
Utilities
IVRS
-
XT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVRS vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank
IVRS
XT
IVRS vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVRS | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.32 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 3.19 | -3.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.69 | 11.45 | -12.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVRS vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVRS drawdown since its inception was -31.43%, smaller than the maximum XT drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRS and XT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVRS | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.43% | -34.41% | +2.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.43% | -10.45% | -20.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.43% | -22.09% | -9.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.06% | -4.22% | -15.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.51% | -7.35% | +0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.79% | 2.90% | +13.89% |
Volatility
IVRS vs. XT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) at 5.03%. This indicates that IVRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVRS | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | 5.03% | +2.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.96% | 14.41% | +5.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.89% | 17.83% | +6.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 21.09% | -0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 20.13% | +0.75% |
IVRS vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVRS has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVRS vs. XT - Dividend Comparison
IVRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.62%, more than XT's 7.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | 8.62% | 7.88% | 6.65% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 7.08% | 7.95% | 0.66% | 0.41% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 1.55% | 1.40% | 0.97% | 1.37% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVRS and XT have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVRS has higher volatility (7.97%) compared to XT (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVRS dropped -31.43% vs XT's -34.41%.
On 3-year performance, XT leads with 16.27% vs 7.73% for IVRS. On fees, XT is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XT has performed better with a 16.27% return vs 7.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XT is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IVRS.
IVRS has the higher dividend yield at 8.62%, compared with 7.08% for XT.
IVRS tracks Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IVRS and 0.46% for XT.
XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVRS and XT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer