IVRS vs. XT
IVRS (iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF) and XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from iShares - IVRS tracks the Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net while XT tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IVRS returned 9.46%/yr vs 18.83%/yr for XT. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVRS charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for XT.
Performance
IVRS vs. XT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVRS achieves a -5.51% return, which is significantly lower than XT's 20.20% return.
IVRS
- 1D
- -2.21%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- -5.51%
- 6M
- -8.57%
- 1Y
- -1.11%
- 3Y*
- 9.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XT
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 9.47%
- YTD
- 20.20%
- 6M
- 20.54%
- 1Y
- 45.88%
- 3Y*
- 18.83%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- 14.70%
IVRS vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | -5.51% | 12.75% | 7.40% | 28.15% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 20.20% | 26.28% | 0.29% | 13.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVRS and XT is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2023 | 0.84 |
The correlation between IVRS and XT shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IVRS vs. XT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVRS
XT
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IVRS
XT
Communication Services
IVRS
XT
Financial Services
IVRS
XT
Consumer Cyclical
IVRS
XT
Basic Materials
IVRS
-
XT
Consumer Defensive
IVRS
-
XT
Energy
IVRS
-
XT
Healthcare
IVRS
-
XT
Industrials
IVRS
-
XT
Real Estate
IVRS
-
XT
Utilities
IVRS
-
XT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVRS vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank
IVRS
XT
IVRS vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVRS | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.48 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 4.41 | -4.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.08 | 18.51 | -18.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVRS | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 | 2.89 | -2.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.66 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
IVRS vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVRS drawdown since its inception was -31.43%, smaller than the maximum XT drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRS and XT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVRS | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.43% | -34.41% | +2.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.43% | -10.45% | -20.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.43% | -22.09% | -9.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.72% | -0.47% | -18.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.81% | -7.41% | +1.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.55% | 2.49% | +12.06% |
Volatility
IVRS vs. XT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) at 4.85%. This indicates that IVRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVRS | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.53% | 4.85% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.59% | 11.94% | +6.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.85% | 15.99% | +5.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 20.76% | -0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 20.08% | +0.41% |
IVRS vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVRS has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVRS vs. XT - Dividend Comparison
IVRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%, more than XT's 6.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | 8.34% | 7.88% | 6.65% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 6.61% | 7.95% | 0.66% | 0.41% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 1.55% | 1.40% | 0.97% | 1.37% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVRS and XT have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVRS has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to XT (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVRS dropped -31.43% vs XT's -34.41%.
On 3-year performance, XT leads with 18.83% vs 9.46% for IVRS. On fees, XT is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XT has performed better with a 18.83% return vs 9.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XT is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IVRS.
IVRS has the higher dividend yield at 8.34%, compared with 6.61% for XT.
IVRS tracks Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IVRS and 0.46% for XT.
XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVRS and XT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer