PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVRS vs. TCAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVRS vs. TCAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and Tortoise AI Infrastructure ETF (TCAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVRS achieves a -5.51% return, which is significantly lower than TCAI's 89.63% return.


IVRS

1D
-2.21%
1M
1.13%
YTD
-5.51%
6M
-8.57%
1Y
-1.11%
3Y*
9.46%
5Y*
10Y*

TCAI

1D
-0.27%
1M
19.58%
YTD
89.63%
6M
85.78%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVRS vs. TCAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IVRS and TCAI is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2025

0.52

IVRS vs. TCAI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVRS
TCAI

Technology

38.4%
44.0%

Communication Services

37.3%
1.1%

Financial Services

19.7%
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
1.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

6.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

29.9%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Utilities

-

11.1%

Technology

IVRS
38.4%
TCAI
44.0%

Communication Services

IVRS
37.3%
TCAI
1.1%

Financial Services

IVRS
19.7%
TCAI
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IVRS
4.6%
TCAI
1.4%

Basic Materials

IVRS

-

TCAI

-

Consumer Defensive

IVRS

-

TCAI

-

Energy

IVRS

-

TCAI
6.1%

Healthcare

IVRS

-

TCAI

-

Industrials

IVRS

-

TCAI
29.9%

Real Estate

IVRS

-

TCAI
0.6%

Utilities

IVRS

-

TCAI
11.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVRS vs. TCAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVRS
IVRS Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
IVRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVRS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
IVRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVRS Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

TCAI
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVRS vs. TCAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and Tortoise AI Infrastructure ETF (TCAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVRSTCAIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.08

IVRS vs. TCAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVRSTCAIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

4.61

-4.00

Drawdowns

IVRS vs. TCAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVRS drawdown since its inception was -31.43%, which is greater than TCAI's maximum drawdown of -15.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRS and TCAI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVRSTCAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.43%

-15.80%

-15.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.72%

-0.27%

-18.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-3.43%

-2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.55%

Volatility

IVRS vs. TCAI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVRSTCAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.85%

35.82%

-13.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.49%

35.82%

-15.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.49%

35.82%

-15.33%

IVRS vs. TCAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVRS has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than TCAI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVRS vs. TCAI - Dividend Comparison

IVRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%, more than TCAI's 0.03% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IVRS
iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF
8.34%7.88%6.65%0.48%
TCAI
Tortoise AI Infrastructure ETF
0.03%0.05%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVRS and TCAI have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IVRS is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IVRS is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TCAI.

IVRS has the higher dividend yield at 8.34%, compared with 0.03% for TCAI.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IVRS and 0.65% for TCAI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVRS and TCAI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer