IVRS vs. CHPS
IVRS (iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVRS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IVRS returned 7.73%/yr vs 49.43%/yr for CHPS. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IVRS charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.
Performance
IVRS vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVRS achieves a -7.07% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 70.98% return.
IVRS
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- 6M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- -7.07%
- 1Y
- -11.56%
- 3Y*
- 7.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.16%
CHPS
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -11.74%
- 6M
- 41.98%
- YTD
- 70.98%
- 1Y
- 141.43%
- 3Y*
- 49.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 46.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.66M | $2.47M | $3.90M | |
| $45.64K | $34.99K | $21.63K |
IVRS vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | -7.07% | 12.75% | 7.40% | 8.07% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 70.98% | 58.47% | 7.75% | 10.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVRS and CHPS is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023 | 0.66 |
The correlation between IVRS and CHPS shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IVRS vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVRS
CHPS
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
IVRS
CHPS
Technology
IVRS
CHPS
Financial Services
IVRS
CHPS
Consumer Cyclical
IVRS
CHPS
Basic Materials
IVRS
-
CHPS
-
Consumer Defensive
IVRS
-
CHPS
Energy
IVRS
-
CHPS
Healthcare
IVRS
-
CHPS
-
Industrials
IVRS
-
CHPS
Real Estate
IVRS
-
CHPS
-
Utilities
IVRS
-
CHPS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVRS vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank
IVRS
CHPS
IVRS vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVRS | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.44 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 4.35 | -4.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.69 | 18.16 | -18.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVRS vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVRS drawdown since its inception was -31.43%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRS and CHPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVRS | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.43% | -39.44% | +8.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.43% | -32.74% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.43% | -39.44% | +8.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.06% | -24.91% | +4.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.51% | -9.38% | +2.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.79% | 7.82% | +8.97% |
Volatility
IVRS vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) is 7.97%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 19.17%. This indicates that IVRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVRS | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | 19.17% | -11.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.96% | 40.21% | -20.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.89% | 45.64% | -21.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 37.27% | -16.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 37.27% | -16.39% |
IVRS vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVRS has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVRS vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
IVRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.62%, more than CHPS's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.38% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% |
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | 8.62% | 7.88% | 6.65% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVRS and CHPS have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPS has higher volatility (19.17%) compared to IVRS (7.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVRS dropped -31.43% vs CHPS's -39.44%.
On 3-year performance, CHPS leads with 49.43% vs 7.73% for IVRS. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IVRS has been the lower-risk option at 7.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 49.43% return vs 7.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IVRS.
IVRS has the higher dividend yield at 8.62%, compared with 0.38% for CHPS.
IVRS is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. IVRS tracks Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IVRS and 0.15% for CHPS.
CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVRS and CHPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer