IVRA vs. SCHG

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

IVRA (Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVRA is a ESG fund actively managed by Invesco, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. IVRA is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IVRA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

IVRA vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IVRA

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

SCHG

• 1D: 2.02%
• 1M: 2.17%
• 6M: 8.95%
• YTD: 7.11%
• 1Y: 18.50%
• 3Y*: 23.37%
• 5Y*: 13.47%
• 10Y*: 18.33%
• ALL TIME*: 16.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	$249.58M	$250.01M	$339.80M

IVRA vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF	11.70%	10.20%	13.07%	9.13%	-10.00%	32.74%	1.28%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	7.11%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	1.10%

Correlation

The correlation between IVRA and SCHG is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2020	0.41

The correlation between IVRA and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IVRA vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IVRA	SCHG
Real Estate	48.6%	0.6%
Energy	23.5%	0.9%
Basic Materials	13.7%	1.6%
Utilities	10.3%	0.5%
Consumer Defensive	1.7%	1.9%
Consumer Cyclical	1.5%	11.2%
Financial Services	0.7%	7.7%
Communication Services	-	14.1%
Healthcare	-	9.9%
Industrials	-	7.6%
Technology	-	44.0%

Return for Risk

IVRA vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IVRA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 39
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 41
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IVRA vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IVRA	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.12	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.59	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.20	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.13	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.58	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IVRA	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-34.59%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.41%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.15%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-5.19%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.19%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IVRA	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.76%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.02%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	16.66%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	22.45%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	21.60%	—

IVRA vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVRA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVRA vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

IVRA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF	16.54%	5.68%	3.71%	2.47%	2.30%	3.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVRA and SCHG in my portfolio?

IVRA and SCHG have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IVRA or SCHG?

On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVRA or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IVRA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVRA or SCHG?

IVRA has the higher dividend yield at 16.54%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between IVRA and SCHG?

IVRA is categorized as ESG, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IVRA and 0.04% for SCHG.