IVRA vs. BIZD
IVRA (Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF) and BIZD (VanEck BDC Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVRA is a ESG fund actively managed by Invesco, while BIZD is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. IVRA is actively managed, while BIZD is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IVRA returned 7.62%/yr vs 4.03%/yr for BIZD. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVRA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BIZD.
Performance
IVRA vs. BIZD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVRA achieves a 11.70% return, which is significantly higher than BIZD's -8.99% return.
IVRA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 11.70%
- 6M
- 12.41%
- 1Y
- 15.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.46%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- —
BIZD
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- -6.62%
- YTD
- -8.99%
- 6M
- -10.20%
- 1Y
- -12.94%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.03%
- 10Y*
- 7.77%
IVRA vs. BIZD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF | 11.70% | 10.20% | 13.07% | 9.13% | -10.00% | 32.74% | 1.58% |
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | -8.99% | -4.96% | 15.63% | 27.02% | -8.51% | 36.25% | 2.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVRA and BIZD is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2020 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IVRA and BIZD has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IVRA vs. BIZD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVRA
BIZD
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Real Estate
IVRA
BIZD
-
Energy
IVRA
BIZD
-
Basic Materials
IVRA
BIZD
-
Utilities
IVRA
BIZD
-
Consumer Cyclical
IVRA
BIZD
-
Consumer Defensive
IVRA
BIZD
-
Financial Services
IVRA
BIZD
Communication Services
IVRA
-
BIZD
-
Healthcare
IVRA
-
BIZD
-
Industrials
IVRA
-
BIZD
-
Technology
IVRA
-
BIZD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVRA vs. BIZD — Risk / Return Rank
IVRA
BIZD
IVRA vs. BIZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVRA | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.72 | -0.72 | +2.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.49 | -0.93 | +3.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 0.90 | +0.46 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | -0.58 | +4.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.02 | -1.03 | +13.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVRA | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | -0.72 | +2.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.23 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.30 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
IVRA vs. BIZD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVRA drawdown since its inception was -25.99%, smaller than the maximum BIZD drawdown of -55.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRA and BIZD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVRA | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.99% | -55.44% | +29.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.60% | -22.22% | +17.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.03% | -22.56% | +7.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.99% | -22.91% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | -19.27% | +18.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.27% | -6.72% | -0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.32% | 12.63% | -11.31% |
Volatility
IVRA vs. BIZD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) is 0.00%, while VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that IVRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVRA | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 4.79% | -4.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.45% | 14.77% | -9.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.27% | 18.11% | -8.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 17.40% | -0.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.39% | 21.74% | -5.35% |
IVRA vs. BIZD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVRA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than BIZD's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVRA vs. BIZD - Dividend Comparison
IVRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.99%, more than BIZD's 13.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | 13.87% | 11.78% | 10.94% | 10.96% | 11.21% | 8.14% | 10.39% | 9.13% | 10.88% | 9.13% | 8.51% | 9.12% |
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF | 16.99% | 5.68% | 3.71% | 2.47% | 2.30% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVRA and BIZD have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIZD has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to IVRA (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVRA dropped -25.99% vs BIZD's -55.44%.
On 5-year performance, IVRA leads with 7.62% vs 4.03% for BIZD. On fees, BIZD is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, IVRA has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IVRA has performed better with a 7.62% return vs 4.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BIZD is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IVRA.
IVRA has the higher dividend yield at 16.99%, compared with 13.87% for BIZD.
IVRA is categorized as ESG, while BIZD is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IVRA and 0.42% for BIZD.
IVRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVRA and BIZD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer