PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVOV vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVOV vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVOV achieves a 13.17% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 11.15% return. Over the past 10 years, IVOV has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 10.61%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.39% annualized return.


IVOV

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.84%
6M
8.73%
YTD
13.17%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
11.95%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
10.61%
ALL TIME*
11.75%

VT

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.20%
6M
7.80%
YTD
11.15%
1Y
23.51%
3Y*
18.19%
5Y*
10.58%
10Y*
12.39%
ALL TIME*
8.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$975.54K$1.11M$1.64M
$425.08M$369.63M$481.55M

IVOV vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
13.17%7.61%11.53%15.38%-7.20%30.50%3.70%25.91%-12.13%12.22%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
11.15%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between IVOV and VT is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.78

The correlation between IVOV and VT shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IVOV vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVOV
VT

Financial Services

21.8%
15.7%

Industrials

19.2%
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

13.9%
9.0%

Technology

10.3%
31.2%

Real Estate

9.5%
2.3%

Energy

6.3%
3.6%

Basic Materials

5.7%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.5%

Utilities

4.0%
2.5%

Healthcare

3.8%
8.3%

Communication Services

0.8%
7.4%

Financial Services

IVOV
21.8%
VT
15.7%

Industrials

IVOV
19.2%
VT
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IVOV
13.9%
VT
9.0%

Technology

IVOV
10.3%
VT
31.2%

Real Estate

IVOV
9.5%
VT
2.3%

Energy

IVOV
6.3%
VT
3.6%

Basic Materials

IVOV
5.7%
VT
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

IVOV
4.8%
VT
4.5%

Utilities

IVOV
4.0%
VT
2.5%

Healthcare

IVOV
3.8%
VT
8.3%

Communication Services

IVOV
0.8%
VT
7.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVOV vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IVOV
IVOV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
IVOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOV Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IVOV vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVOVVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.29

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

2.29

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.05

9.54

-2.49

IVOV vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVOV and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVOV vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVOV drawdown since its inception was -45.99%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOV and VT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVOVVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.99%

-50.27%

+4.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.58%

-9.67%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.61%

-16.51%

-6.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.61%

-26.38%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.99%

-34.24%

-11.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-1.84%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-6.97%

+1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

2.32%

+0.65%

Volatility

IVOV vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) is 3.31%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that IVOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVOVVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

3.99%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.36%

11.68%

-1.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.98%

13.96%

+1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.26%

16.22%

+3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.65%

17.18%

+4.47%

IVOV vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IVOV vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

IVOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than VT's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
1.61%1.82%1.74%1.52%1.97%1.78%2.42%1.75%1.87%1.55%1.51%1.66%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.59%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVOV and VT have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VT has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to IVOV (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOV dropped -45.99% vs VT's -50.27%.

On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.39% vs 10.61% for IVOV. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IVOV has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.39% return vs 10.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IVOV.

IVOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 1.59% for VT.

IVOV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VT is Global Equities. IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOV and 0.06% for VT.

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVOV and VT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer